My intention in relaying the rebuttal to the UPI was to debate the authenticity of his charges and let the record show. The political end of this was negligible, and if you disagree why not let me just modify the few words that have incriminated me. I'm sure it's a wonderful feeling being a Super Moderator on a forum where you can nullify as you please but there was a legitimate counter-argument
likewise it stressed differences not in a mundane opinion based on favorites but sourced and researched material! I would ask that you rethink this.