SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

This is a discussion on Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke within the Navy forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Which ship would your rather be? An Arleigh Burke with 8 Sunburns coming, or a Sovremenny with 8 harpoons or ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Navy

China Defence Today Forum


Navy Forum for China navy, chinese naval forces, PLAN weapons, ships, submarines and news

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2005   #16
Da Grand Pubah
 
bd popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids Iowa
Posts: 9,288
bd popeye is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Quote:
Which ship would your rather be? An Arleigh Burke with 8 Sunburns coming, or a Sovremenny with 8 harpoons or TASM coming?
An Arliegh Burke of course. I know the systems on those ships work. After 9-11-2001 Tico's and A/B's were used for air defense of the US.

As we know USN ships never would operate alone in any combat situation. So a one on one confrontation between a 52C & A/B would probaly never happen.
bd popeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #17
Super Moderator
 
tphuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,095
tphuang is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Quote:
Originally Posted by IDonT
Hmm, a salvo of 8 supersonic missiles huh. Aegis was designed to neutralized the Soviet Union Backfire regiments that were firing massive numbers of AS6 missiles that have mach 3 speed. 8 missiles are a drop in the bucket.

Do you ever wonder why the US never bothered with them? At mach 2, it takes roughly 30 seconds to cross the horizon. Can your missile giudance system tell the difference between 1 Burke destroyer, 6 Chaff clouds, 3 Floating decoys, 1 helicopter emmiting the radar signiture of the a destroyer within 30 seconds? Further more, the missiles' bulk and speed gives it a very narrow flight path and detection radius. It can't manuever as great as a subsonic missile.

The Mk 41 vls can fire ALL of its standard missiles at the SAME TIME. The maximum number that can be guided by the Burke is classified but its greater than 16 (2 per missile). Then add ESSM and Phalax just in case.
considering that the Chinese Aegis defense system is supposedly stolen from the Americans, I think it has to be based on something good, so it can potentially have good tracking software. We don't know. Also, nobody knows exactly the accuracy of YJ-85 against moving targets, but we do know it's range.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 558
vincelee is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

"How do you pre-program an evassive actions when you do not know ahead of time how a target ship will react?"

do you really need to know? tracking principles of the SM-2/SPY-1 is well known, and the attacking missile has the initiative. I can be blind and deaf, but all I have to do is to run around in random order and I'm pretty sure that'll give the defender a harder time.
vincelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #19
Banned
 
MIGleader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Da Eastside
Posts: 3,540
MIGleader is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

An arleigh buek has a lower survivability chance. asuming both ships use aegis, the 52c would be able to shoot it's missles at a distance while staying out of range. and it wouyld be detected later due it's stealth feature. the burke has no stealth! if both ships ran out of missles, the 52c would win due to its faster firing guns.
MIGleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #20
Senior Member
 
FriedRiceNSpice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,422
FriedRiceNSpice is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Quote:
Originally Posted by MIGleader
An arleigh buek has a lower survivability chance. asuming both ships use aegis, the 52c would be able to shoot it's missles at a distance while staying out of range. and it wouyld be detected later due it's stealth feature. the burke has no stealth! if both ships ran out of missles, the 52c would win due to its faster firing guns.
The Type 052C does not use Aegis. Aegis is an American system, and only used on ships built by the Americans or built with American assistance. The US does not give such technology to the PRC. It is also unlikely that Israel or any other ally of the PRC had Aegis technology to give to the PRC. Maybe you mean the 052C uses technology that are supposed to perform the same role as the Aegis, or technology equivalent to the Aegis.
FriedRiceNSpice is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #21
Banned
 
MIGleader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Da Eastside
Posts: 3,540
MIGleader is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

yes, thats what I meant
MIGleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #22
Senior Member
 
FriedRiceNSpice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,422
FriedRiceNSpice is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

We have no idea on how the Chinese system is qualtively in comparisson with the Aegis system. The PRC does not release such data on its weapons systems. Thus, we do now known the capabilities, reliability, or performance aspects of the Chinese system.
FriedRiceNSpice is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #23
Banned
 
BrotherofSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 460
BrotherofSnake is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Is this Type 52 an A/B clone or Sovremenny clone?
BrotherofSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #24
Banned
 
MIGleader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Da Eastside
Posts: 3,540
MIGleader is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

go on the website please.

the 52 b does feature some of the weapons of soveremy like the grizzly air defence missle and top plate radar, but it's an indegedous design with mostly indegedous systems.

52c is an almost completely indegedous systems. it has nothing to do with sovremmenny.
MIGleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #25
Banned
 
BrotherofSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 460
BrotherofSnake is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

The Burke has a lot of stealth features. It has a radar cross section of a tug boat from what ive heard.
BrotherofSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #26
Banned
 
MIGleader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Da Eastside
Posts: 3,540
MIGleader is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

yeah right. no, the burke design was concieved in the seventies. they didn't have much stealth knolege back then. you must have heard about that new stealthy destroyer the navy made... it hasn't entered service yet.
MIGleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,077
IDonT is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Quote:
Originally Posted by MIGleader
yeah right. no, the burke design was concieved in the seventies. they didn't have much stealth knolege back then. you must have heard about that new stealthy destroyer the navy made... it hasn't entered service yet.
The B-2 and F-117 were conceived in the 70's. Believe it or not, the fact is the Burke has a very low radar signitur.e
IDonT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #28
Banned
 
BrotherofSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 460
BrotherofSnake is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

The Burke is not 70's tech get your facts straight. The first A/B class was commissioned in 91. The Burke incorporates stealthy features such as slanted angles to reduce its radar signature.

Last edited by BrotherofSnake; 09-02-2005 at 08:57 PM.
BrotherofSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,077
IDonT is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

Quote:
Originally Posted by MIGleader
go on the website please.

the 52 b does feature some of the weapons of soveremy like the grizzly air defence missle and top plate radar, but it's an indegedous design with mostly indegedous systems.

52c is an almost completely indegedous systems. it has nothing to do with sovremmenny.

052 C uses Ukranian Phased Array radar, Russian revolver VLS launcher, and a navalized S-300 Sam system. Not exactly indiginious.
IDonT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2005   #30
Senior Member
 
FriedRiceNSpice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,422
FriedRiceNSpice is on a distinguished road
Re: Type 52C VS. Arleigh Burke

The Burke does appear to have some stealth features:



But the 052C appears far more stealthy.

FriedRiceNSpice is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13