Page 1 of 18 12345611 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 256
Like Tree93Likes

Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

This is a discussion on Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels within the Navy forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Here are some speculation evolving around some future major Chinese combat vessels: 1. Type 052D DDG: this will be a ...

  1. #1
    SinoSoldier's Avatar
    SinoSoldier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the void between the concept of conclusion and hypothesis
    Posts
    532

    Question Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Here are some speculation evolving around some future major Chinese combat vessels:

    1. Type 052D DDG: this will be a 10,000 ton destroyer, upgraded version of the Type 052C, with up to 96 VLS launchers and 128 YJ-12 anti ship missiles. Construction is expected in 2012. This will be the main surface combatant of the future PLA Navy.

    2. Type 051D DDG: this will be an enlarged and enhanced variant of the Type 051C, with possible parallel construction time with the Type 052D.

    3. Type 054B FFG: not much is known, but it is expected to enter construction after the 12th Type 054A is launched (I'm expecting late 2011).

    4. Type 095 SSN: it could feature VLS launched cruise and anti ship missiles. Initial operational capability could be achieved as early as 2012. It may also feature pump jet propulsion.

    5. Type 096 SSBN: with 24 SLBMs, this monster would be based on the Type 094. Its design reportedly has already been finished, and could enter construction in a few years, after 2 Type 095 SSNs are built.

    6. Type 094 Type 2: this is a newer variant of the Type 094 SSBN, with 16 SLBMs, and could be launched 2011-2012. Not much is known. It may not even exist.

    7. Type 081 HLD: capacity to carry up to 500 troops, this LHD will enter construction after 3 Type 071 LPDs are built. (Probably 2012-2013).

    8. Type 089 CV: conventional aircraft carrier, 65000 tons displacement. 3 may be built, including the Varyag.

    9. Type 085 CV: nuclear powered aircraft carrier, 93000 tons displacement. 2 may be built.

    Sources: Information Dissemination, Deagel, SinoDefence, Huitong, various military blogs.


    Not every future vessel is included. But these are some that we know of.

    Please provide your opinion and criticism and your own sources as well.

  2. #2
    siegecrossbow's Avatar
    siegecrossbow is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park, Texas
    Posts
    2,437

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    What about the fabled missile-defence laser equipped destroyer?
    delft likes this.

  3. #3
    SinoSoldier's Avatar
    SinoSoldier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the void between the concept of conclusion and hypothesis
    Posts
    532

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by siegecrossbow View Post
    What about the fabled missile-defence laser equipped destroyer?
    That crap is nothing but blogger speculation.

    China may have laser blinding weapons in development or testing, but I highly doubt it's going to be deployed on ships anytime soon.

  4. #4
    Bltizo's Avatar
    Bltizo is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The People's Republic of Socialist Romanticism
    Posts
    3,892

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    128 YJ-12 missiles... in addition to the 96 VLS cells? Lol...

    Dude where did you pull these vessels from? I mean we all know about the 052D and the 095, supposed 054B and 081 but they're as tangible as smoke right now.
    And why would the PLAN revert to steam turbines for "051D"? The only "source" I know which mentions that is the sinodefence page which hasn't been updated in years...
    Also most people think the pair of conventional carriers will have cats, so quite different to the Varyag...
    CARRIER HAS ARRIVED! ^^

  5. #5
    SinoSoldier's Avatar
    SinoSoldier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the void between the concept of conclusion and hypothesis
    Posts
    532

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by Bltizo View Post
    128 YJ-12 missiles... in addition to the 96 VLS cells? Lol...

    Dude where did you pull these vessels from? I mean we all know about the 052D and the 095, supposed 054B and 081 but they're as tangible as smoke right now.
    Hence the term "speculation". I've read many articles regarding such matters, US prediction charts, and some blogs by military analysts, and most of them seem to agree with the tonnage and the rough timeline. 128 YJ-12 are not "in addition" to the 96 VLS cells. Like the Arleigh Burke, it is generally believed that the Type 052D will be able to carry cruise missiles and anti ship missiles in addition to SAMs in its VLS launchers.

    The South Korean destroyers can carry 128 missiles. I don't see why future PLA-N destroyers can't.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bltizo View Post
    And why would the PLAN revert to steam turbines for "051D"? The only "source" I know which mentions that is the sinodefence page which hasn't been updated in years...
    Funny thing is, I read the SinoDefence page after I got hold of initial talk of the Type 051D. It's from a place called Information Dissemination, which is written by a military analyst. He states that the Type 051D will be a larger version of the Type 051C, and will be built by Dalian Shipyard. He did some calculations and forecasts based on shipbuilding rates, and he predicts that the Type 052D and Type 051D should be revealed by 2013. That is pretty consistent with the 2012 prediction by other bloggers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bltizo View Post
    Also most people think the pair of conventional carriers will have cats, so quite different to the Varyag...
    I have no doubt that the Type 089 will be based on the Varyag.

  6. #6
    Bltizo's Avatar
    Bltizo is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The People's Republic of Socialist Romanticism
    Posts
    3,892

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by SinoSoldier View Post
    Hence the term "speculation". I've read many articles regarding such matters, US prediction charts, and some blogs by military analysts, and most of them seem to agree with the tonnage and the rough timeline. 128 YJ-12 are not "in addition" to the 96 VLS cells. Like the Arleigh Burke, it is generally believed that the Type 052D will be able to carry cruise missiles and anti ship missiles in addition to SAMs in its VLS launchers.
    Great, I'll hold you to that then.

    The South Korean destroyers can carry 128 missiles. I don't see why future PLA-N destroyers can't.
    Maybe because the chinese shipbuliding industry despite all its advances and recently being crowned number one, still doesn't have the expertise to build such a large ship, with propulsion inparticular? And you said 96 VLS... how will you fit 128 missiles into 96?

    I also think more VLS cells do not equate to a better ship.

    Funny thing is, I read the SinoDefence page after I got hold of initial talk of the Type 051D. It's from a place called Information Dissemination, which is written by a military analyst. He states that the Type 051D will be a larger version of the Type 051C, and will be built by Dalian Shipyard. He did some calculations and forecasts based on shipbuilding rates, and he predicts that the Type 052D and Type 051D should be revealed by 2013. That is pretty consistent with the 2012 prediction by other bloggers.
    How long ago was this post and which contributor posted the article?
    If the PLAN went with a larger version of the 051C... well all I can say is that it would be a waste of money.

    I have no doubt that the Type 089 will be based on the Varyag.
    So you think it will have ski jumps?
    CARRIER HAS ARRIVED! ^^

  7. #7
    Maggern's Avatar
    Maggern is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Home of spray cans and cheese slicers
    Posts
    619

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by SinoSoldier View Post
    That crap is nothing but blogger speculation.

    China may have laser blinding weapons in development or testing, but I highly doubt it's going to be deployed on ships anytime soon.
    Did he siegecrossbow even mean that seriously...
    Bltizo likes this.

  8. #8
    Hyperwarp's Avatar
    Hyperwarp is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Colombo, Sri-Lanka
    Posts
    480

    Question Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by SinoSoldier View Post
    Hence the term "speculation". I've read many articles regarding such matters, US prediction charts, and some blogs by military analysts, and most of them seem to agree with the tonnage and the rough timeline. 128 YJ-12 are not "in addition" to the 96 VLS cells. Like the Arleigh Burke, it is generally believed that the Type 052D will be able to carry cruise missiles and anti ship missiles in addition to SAMs in its VLS launchers.

    The South Korean destroyers can carry 128 missiles. I don't see why future PLA-N destroyers can't.
    I assume you are referring to the KDX-III? This ship has 128 VLS cells (80 Mk.41 + 48 K-VLS) to carry those 128 missile. It also has a max displacement of 11,000 tons!

    128 YJ-12 missiles in 96 VLS tubes? YJ-12 is said to be some top secret supersonic antiship cruise missile. I don't expect this missile to be small. Seen how big surface launched supersonic ASCMs are?

    Here is the Mk 41 to compare - Link-1, Link-2

  9. #9
    i.e. is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,096

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by SinoSoldier View Post
    That crap is nothing but blogger speculation.

    China may have laser blinding weapons in development or testing, but I highly doubt it's going to be deployed on ships anytime soon.
    and yours is not?

  10. #10
    siegecrossbow's Avatar
    siegecrossbow is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park, Texas
    Posts
    2,437

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by Maggern View Post
    Did he siegecrossbow even mean that seriously...
    Actually I did, to a certain degree. Rumors of such a weapon has been floating around Chinese military forums for quite a while now.

  11. #11
    Maggern's Avatar
    Maggern is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Home of spray cans and cheese slicers
    Posts
    619

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by siegecrossbow View Post
    Actually I did, to a certain degree. Rumors of such a weapon has been floating around Chinese military forums for quite a while now.
    You mean hey-I'm-a-fanboy-and-I-think-this-might-be-real-like-the-earthquake-gun-of-the-US-and-the-international-conspiracy-of-space-reptiles, or do you mean there's actually indication of a serious effort in design and prototypization, outside mere studies on the US airborne laser system? Frankly, at the level laser technology is nowadays, I don't see how it would be small and effective enough to have any place in a saturation defense. Most likely, for it to be strong enough to knock out missiles (physically knocking them out, most likely the missiles within range would be in terminal guidance, hence blinding them or disabling controls would be of little use), it would be so large they would have to dedicate a whole ship to that sole role, which would make it yet another target to be protected (what would the energy demand even be? Is this even feasible without nuclear reactors? People are still discussing whether EMAL is possible without nuclear reactors)

    As with all laser technology, I'm sure there's some studies into it. Technology advances rapidly in this area. But I don't see laser-equipped ships protecting a carrier in the Indian Ocean any time soon (though considering the open time frame of sinosoldier, I guess we cannot rule it out).

    EDIT: Why am I even discussing this with myself? Even sinosoldier has waved it off as fanboy speculation...

  12. #12
    siegecrossbow's Avatar
    siegecrossbow is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park, Texas
    Posts
    2,437

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by Maggern View Post
    You mean hey-I'm-a-fanboy-and-I-think-this-might-be-real-like-the-earthquake-gun-of-the-US-and-the-international-conspiracy-of-space-reptiles, or do you mean there's actually indication of a serious effort in design and prototypization, outside mere studies on the US airborne laser system? Frankly, at the level laser technology is nowadays, I don't see how it would be small and effective enough to have any place in a saturation defense. Most likely, for it to be strong enough to knock out missiles (physically knocking them out, most likely the missiles within range would be in terminal guidance, hence blinding them or disabling controls would be of little use), it would be so large they would have to dedicate a whole ship to that sole role, which would make it yet another target to be protected (what would the energy demand even be? Is this even feasible without nuclear reactors? People are still discussing whether EMAL is possible without nuclear reactors)

    As with all laser technology, I'm sure there's some studies into it. Technology advances rapidly in this area. But I don't see laser-equipped ships protecting a carrier in the Indian Ocean any time soon (though considering the open time frame of sinosoldier, I guess we cannot rule it out).

    EDIT: Why am I even discussing this with myself? Even sinosoldier has waved it off as fanboy speculation...
    I would have dismissed it as fanboy nonsense (I usually do with claims like these) but the guy who leaked it, peishens, is a well respected "leaker" on CD who leaked J-20's first flight. I think it is good to maintain a healthy skepticism of such matters but when you have a reputable source like peishens you have to reevaluate your skepticism.

    The U.S. is working on a similar system for ship defence, the Centurion and the tests so far are successful. They've tested it against drones and even unmanned boats and achieved promising results. Can't help but wonder when they are going to test it against cruise missiles.

  13. #13
    Engineer's Avatar
    Engineer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,314

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Laser weaponry have been discussed by various big shrimps for years, so it isn't your usual fanboy speculation.

    siegecrossbow, originally they said lasers would be installed on home grown aircraft carriers, but last I heard that plan was scrapped and the role of laser defense were to be assumed by the escorts, and I assume by escorts they meant 052D.
    siegecrossbow likes this.

  14. #14
    SinoSoldier's Avatar
    SinoSoldier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the void between the concept of conclusion and hypothesis
    Posts
    532

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by Hyperwarp View Post
    I assume you are referring to the KDX-III? This ship has 128 VLS cells (80 Mk.41 + 48 K-VLS) to carry those 128 missile. It also has a max displacement of 11,000 tons!

    128 YJ-12 missiles in 96 VLS tubes? YJ-12 is said to be some top secret supersonic antiship cruise missile. I don't expect this missile to be small. Seen how big surface launched supersonic ASCMs are?

    Here is the Mk 41 to compare - Link-1, Link-2
    Hence the 128 missiles on the Type 052D. With tonnage approximately 10000 tons, 128 missiles won't be too much of a difficulty.

    The YJ-12 is not top secret. It's basically a supersonic anti ship missile. Heck, there's even a Wikipedia page on it, although we all know the accuracy of Wikipedia's information.

  15. #15
    SinoSoldier's Avatar
    SinoSoldier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the void between the concept of conclusion and hypothesis
    Posts
    532

    Re: Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

    Quote Originally Posted by i.e. View Post
    and yours is not?
    As much as I want to, I currently do not possess a ship borne laser system.

Page 1 of 18 12345611 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 10:21 AM
  2. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 11:39 PM
  3. Replies: 251
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 09:31 PM
  4. Facts about Israel you didn't know about
    By britbornchinese in forum Members' Club Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-02-2006, 12:03 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-10-2006, 04:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13