Page 60 of 139 FirstFirst ... 1020305055565758596061626364657090100110 ... LastLast
Results 886 to 900 of 2083
Like Tree807Likes

PLAN submarines Thread II

This is a discussion on PLAN submarines Thread II within the Navy forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by sealordlawrence The following picture, taken at Hainan and posted on Xinhui's blog shows what appear to be ...

  1. #886
    tphuang's Avatar
    tphuang is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,375

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by sealordlawrence View Post
    The following picture, taken at Hainan and posted on Xinhui's blog shows what appear to be 2 093 class SSN's and in the background one can just about make out what appears to be an 094 SSBN. This confirms not only that Sanya nuclear submarine base is operational but also that China has significantly re-orientated its nuclear submarine forces to place greater emphasis on its southern flank.

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_3wZSwFvZzq...09e+Stitch.jpg
    Not necessarily, a while ago, we talked about how they have a lot more 093s and 094s than people (including DoD) admitted to. We saw evidences as early as 2008 on GE for 5 093s and 3 094s at different part of the country. It seemed like they had 3 bases with each base having at least 2 093s and 1 094. I also believe they have one or more 091 in Sanya.

    btw, back on the topic of the ocean-going SSKs. I think the Japanese and Australian having shown with their huge submarines that you can really make long range deployments with conventional subs. In fact, the Australians I believe were sending their submarines to spy on the Russians during cold war. So, I would say that it is possible for that new large sub to go far, but I would also say that I can't see it being able to keep up with a fleet for a long range deployment. You need the nuclear subs to escort a fleet for that kind of deployment. However, since we've seen Song submarines go to Sea of Japan, it is quite possible for that new large subs to make patrols to the area between 1st and 2nd island chain.

  2. #887
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    The problem is that recent Google Earth imagery shows that 2 of the 3-4 094 boats that are in existence have not moved for 3 years suggesting that they are not operational.

    If you have the google earth imagery showing the 093 class then please repost it as I have been unable to find it. Certainly all the open sources I am aware of report only 2 093 class boats as having been completed.

    If the names or coordinates of the bases are available that would be great as well?
    Last edited by sealordlawrence; 10-30-2010 at 11:45 AM.

  3. #888
    tphuang's Avatar
    tphuang is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,375

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by sealordlawrence View Post
    The problem is that recent Google Earth imagery shows that 2 of the 3-4 094 boats that are in existence have not moved for 3 years suggesting that they are not operational.

    If you have the google earth imagery showing the 093 class then please repost it as I have been unable to find it. Certainly all the open sources I am aware of report only 2 093 class boats as having been completed.

    If the names or coordinates of the bases are available that would be great as well?
    I'm pretty sure it's earlier in this thread actually. Crobato posted it a while back with those photos. And it's been a problem that I have not really kept up to date with those pictures. Hopefully, the new China's Map World will have better images. Anyway, here is what Crobato posted a while ago,

    these posts are showing 093s at Sanya
    PLAN submarines Thread II
    PLAN submarines Thread II
    these are the ones showing in NSF at Jianggezhuang
    PLAN submarines Thread II
    this is a 093 at Xiaopingdao
    Chinese submarines thread
    but the 093s and 094s in NSF move around between huludao, xiaopingdao and jianggezhuang.

    Need to look up that map world utility to see better photos.

    Edit: let me update, map world is a piece of junk, not ready for use!
    Using google earth's photo of Xiaopingdao from May 12th, there appears to be one sub that is 98 m and another sub that is 78 m (at least the portion that's above water). The first one could be a 093 still. Check 121 29'39'' E and 38 49'03''N
    outside of that, you can get the coordinates of huludao and jianggezhuang from SOC's blog and find them on Google Earth.
    Last edited by tphuang; 10-30-2010 at 02:49 PM.

  4. #889
    A.Man is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,900

  5. #890
    franco-russe is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    867

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by A.Man View Post
    what we have here?
    That is of course a photo (in fact two photos stitched together) of the Yulin nuclear submarine base. It was published on CDF in June of this year. Besides the two SHANG the single JIN can be distinguished behind the SHANG to the right.

  6. #891
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    I think we need ti be careful about reading too much into the Google Earth imagery. For instance Jianggezhuang is clearly the historical main PLAN SSN facility, as can be seen by the presence of a dry dock that appears to have been sized to take nuclear submarines. Now clearly there are 5 SSN's there, however, the first problem we have is that we may well be seeing the entire HAN class, this site is obviously more than just a base but also an upgrade and maintenance facility and it may well have a training function. We could well be looking at decommissioned Han class boats being used as instructional Hulls or simply awaiting disposal.

    The other issue is that the imagery is taken at different times so it is entirely plausible that we are viewing the same submarines twice just at different bases.

    In total, it appears that Google Earth shows 8 SSN's, taking into account the 5 Han class boats and the prospect of seeing the same submarine twice it is entirely plausible that the open source reports of just 2 Shang class boats are entirely accurate.

  7. #892
    franco-russe is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    867

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by sealordlawrence View Post
    The problem is that recent Google Earth imagery shows that 2 of the 3-4 094 boats that are in existence have not moved for 3 years suggesting that they are not operational.

    If you have the google earth imagery showing the 093 class then please repost it as I have been unable to find it. Certainly all the open sources I am aware of report only 2 093 class boats as having been completed.

    If the names or coordinates of the bases are available that would be great as well?
    The co-ordinates for the various SSN facilites are:

    Huludao (Yard No. 431) 40 42 55 02 N 120 59 41 60 E
    Shazikou (Jianggezhuang) 36 06 40 50 N 120 35 11 12 E
    Xiaopingdao 38 49 07 57 N 121 29 39 82 E
    Yulin (Sanya) 18 13 03 60 N 109 40 42 90 E

    I think that it is generally accepted that HAN 401 has been decommissioned, while the remaining four have been upgraded to Type 091G standard. Accepting your number of 8 SSN 憇, that still allows for 4 SHANG class.

  8. #893
    franco-russe is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    867

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
    Not necessarily, a while ago, we talked about how they have a lot more 093s and 094s than people (including DoD) admitted to. We saw evidences as early as 2008 on GE for 5 093s and 3 094s at different part of the country. It seemed like they had 3 bases with each base having at least 2 093s and 1 094. I also believe they have one or more 091 in Sanya.
    Xiaopingdao is not an operational base, it appears to be more of a test and experimental facility. Besides the occasional SSN/SSBN, GOLF 200 and ROMEO (033G) 351 appear to be based there (the home of the defunct 62nd Submarine Flotilla?).

    There is good evidence that HAN 404 and 405 have been transferred to Yulin. I think that 1st Submarine Base a Shazikou and 2nd Submarine Base at Yulin have exactly the samme composition, each having 1 JIN, 2 SHANG and 2 HAN.

    This photo at least leaves litte doubt as to the whereabouts of the HAN class SSN.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #894
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by franco-russe View Post
    I think that it is generally accepted that HAN 401 has been decommissioned, while the remaining four have been upgraded to Type 091G standard. Accepting your number of 8 SSN ‘s, that still allows for 4 SHANG class.
    No it does not, as I explained in my previous post, as Google Earth Imagery is not all captured on the same day, thus it is entirely plausible that we are seeing the same submarine in 2 different places. Secondly, just because the first Han class boat has been decommissioned it does not mean that it will not still be afloat somewhere, indeed what we know about the radiation shielding on those boats it is highly likely that Hull is simply tied up somewhere whilst the PLAN works out how to dispose of it without giving anyone cancer. Alternatively it could be being used as an instructional hull to support crew training. Thus we can not rule out that we are seeing all 5 Han class boats and we have no way of knowing whether we are seeing 8 different SSN's or not.

    We also need to be careful about assuming that one photo determines the basing of a particular vessel, submarines, especially nuclear ones, are highly mobile.
    Last edited by sealordlawrence; 10-31-2010 at 09:30 AM.

  10. #895
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by franco-russe View Post
    Xiaopingdao is not an operational base, it appears to be more of a test and experimental facility. Besides the occasional SSN/SSBN, GOLF 200 and ROMEO (033G) 351 appear to be based there (the home of the defunct 62nd Submarine Flotilla?).
    I would be inclined to agree with this, in fact the Xiaopingdao facility in general is quite strange, a huge amount of effort has been expended there creating a harbour with a range jetties and pier side facilities yet somehow it looks unfinished, as if much more was planned but was then abandoned. In particular there is a curious piece of land north of the facility at 38 49 25 N 121 29 15 E that looks like it was being developed as a new pier-side facility like the one to the south at 38 49 03 N 121 29 40 E but that it was never completed. In many respects it also reminds me of Sanya, especially the location in the way that it occupies the easter side of a bay with a peninsular creating its eastern wall.

    For the amount of activity that appears to happen there it seem odd that they went to so much effort to construct the harbour. I wonder whether this was planned as a major new naval base, perhaps in the late 80s/early 90s but that it became redundant as a result of the end of the Cold War???

  11. #896
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    BTW: Does anybody know where the Shang class is being built?

  12. #897
    franco-russe is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    867

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Of course: the Bohai Shipyard in Huludao, China's only nuclear submarine shipyard. If you look at it in GE, you will find that this rather modest yard has two JIN class lying at the fitting out pier.

  13. #898
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by franco-russe View Post
    Of course: the Bohai Shipyard in Huludao, China's only nuclear submarine shipyard. If you look at it in GE, you will find that this rather modest yard has two JIN class lying at the fitting out pier.
    Of course, and those Jin class boats have now been there for 3 years now!

  14. #899
    franco-russe is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    867

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Perhaps. I think I saw a photo in February of this year, showing one JIN and one SHANG in Huludao.

  15. #900
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    294

    Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

    Quote Originally Posted by franco-russe View Post
    Perhaps. I think I saw a photo in February of this year, showing one JIN and one SHANG in Huludao.
    Well the latest GE imagery is dated March 2 2010 and there are definitely 2 Jin class boats there in the same positions they have been for the last 3 years.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13