SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

Chinese submarines thread

This is a discussion on Chinese submarines thread within the Navy forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Brilliant hypothesis crobato... But if no successor to Yuan comes out dont you think itll leave gap in coastal defence? ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Navy

China Defence Today Forum


Navy Forum for China navy, chinese naval forces, PLAN weapons, ships, submarines and news

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Closed Thread

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2008   #961
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 272
flyzies is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Brilliant hypothesis crobato...
But if no successor to Yuan comes out dont you think itll leave gap in coastal defence? Cos SSNs dont perform as well as SSKs with AIP in littoral waters...

I dont think itll hurt PLAN if they kept both these doctrines you described. Going totally nuclear would be a mistake i think, cos SSKs do give you certain advantages over SSNs...however, it is important to focus more on power projection in future. Main reason for this is protection of trade routes and sea lanes, therefore i think PLAN should focus more on this and next generation of SSNs. Keeping SSKs around for Taiwan scenario and coastal defence will be more than worthwhile tho...
flyzies is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #962
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,877
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyzies View Post
Brilliant hypothesis crobato...
But if no successor to Yuan comes out dont you think itll leave gap in coastal defence? Cos SSNs dont perform as well as SSKs with AIP in littoral waters...
Who are you defending from? Submarines or ships? If you are defending against ships, the PLAN seems to building a horde of 022s (some in the CDF is estimating more than 80+ have been built). It is against subs, a small surface vessel like a corvette with ASW capability can do it faster and at much less the cost. Remember the advantage of any surface vessel is their speed and ability to surge and concentrate in numbers at a given area.

And remember, if you are able to project power in the first place, you don't need much of a coastal defense at all. Power projection takes care of coastal defense itself. Note the United States Navy.

Quote:
I dont think itll hurt PLAN if they kept both these doctrines you described. Going totally nuclear would be a mistake i think, cos SSKs do give you certain advantages over SSNs...however, it is important to focus more on power projection in future. Main reason for this is protection of trade routes and sea lanes, therefore i think PLAN should focus more on this and next generation of SSNs. Keeping SSKs around for Taiwan scenario and coastal defence will be more than worthwhile tho...
There is uncertainty in the doctrines, and I myself am not sure in my opinion how the PLAN should pursue. Remember, each Navy is formed by their own unique geographical requirements. China happens to be hemmed in by island chains which would take a force of nature or by God to remove. In a sense, the PLAN wants to be sure so they put a foot in all camps just to be safe. I have a sense they are not too comfortable to invest too much in the large grain (fewer, but bigger, more capable and more expensive ships) and still seeks the smaller grained (cheaper and more, but less capable and smaller ships). Trying to find a balance between size and number.

I do think that with changing political situations, experience and better hardware, in the future comes with more clarity and with it, focus on which doctrines the PLAN should concentrate more.
crobato is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #963
Junior Member
 
Roger604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 950
Roger604 is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
you need to be a little more specific, which two songs from Shanghai? The Russians are not producing any more kilo for it's own navy. This is kind of interesting, a diesel sub model from China using X-tail with the 7 blade propeller.
http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2...eljan21at4.jpg
That is interesting indeed... assuming its a Chinese model. But how do you know it's a diesel sub? Perhaps the next generation the PLAn is pursuing is going to be a small, quasi-nuclear sub, like the Russian project.
Roger604 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #964
Super Moderator
 
Gollevainen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I aint no stranger, been this place before...
Posts: 4,511
Gollevainen is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Does anyone have left the image of a model of the new proposed chinese SSK which emerged around same time when the good images of 093 popped up? It was smooth, U212'ish unlike any current chinese submarine. Perhaps this model is from the same sub...
__________________

Ooh, your custard pie, yeah, sweet and nice
When you cut it, mama, save me a slice


...and you can have your slice at:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Gollevainen is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #965
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,877
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollevainen View Post
Does anyone have left the image of a model of the new proposed chinese SSK which emerged around same time when the good images of 093 popped up? It was smooth, U212'ish unlike any current chinese submarine. Perhaps this model is from the same sub...
There was two models. The story goes the one with the x tail was a prototype for magnetohydrodynamic drive, while the one with the T tail is said to be a prototype for a new conventional sub. The images should around deep early in this same thread.
crobato is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #966
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 78
beijingcar is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

To Corbato: The U.K did away with SSK's has to do with the fact that where the country is located and also her navy is being part of the NATO framework, with the USSR being gone, with friendly navies all around, same goes for the French Navy( in fact both countries lack the funds to support both SSK and SSN in service). on the other hand, China faces a vast different environment, with unfriendly nations all around. That is where the newer SSK comes to be usefull. With the Chinese SSNs going for the deep seas to protect Chinese interest( or may be tasked to protecting the Chinese SSBNs if the PLAN does not use the bastion strategy of the USSR). The PLAN SSKs with AIP in Chinese coastal homewaters will be able to play with the USN's big fishs. During Cold war times, Even with a robust Sub fleet, the USSR home waters had regularly seen shadows of USN's SSNs, so the best way to hund and kill a Sub is another Sub. On top of all these is the fact of all of the 033, 035 needed to be replaced( may not be on one on one bases). The PLAN has always being strong in her Sub fleet compare to her surface fleet. They are just trying to keep what has being a relatively strong area still yet stronger. Also at three times of the cost and at leat twice the time for building the SSN. The PLAN simply can not afford( money and time frame) to built SSN only. In next ten years, I think we may see SSK to SSN ration to be 3:2 in the PLAN. P.S one more factor is you can export an SSK to make $, but you do not export SSN. So I think the SSK is here to stay.
beijingcar is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #967
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 339
Skywatcher is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

The Chinese could offer the Yuan or any follow up hybrid/AIP models as something for the export market.
Skywatcher is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #968
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,877
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

True. Its a sword and shield strategy. The nuke subs being the sword, the diesel subs being the shield.

The ratio of building SSKs to SSNs however, seemed to have shifted in favor of SSNs in 2007. That is three highly likely 094s at least, vs. two Yuans, though the last Songs were probably finished early this year. Unless of course, there are more Yuans that were built that were not caught in camera.

033s are not likely to be replaced on a one to one basis, the 035s are not that high in number. Old subs are reserved for training duties.

What is more limited than money is trained personnel. If you have a finite source of personnel, you want them on the most effective platform as possible. I don't think China can afford to keep a sheer large number of submarines, simply said I think they would go for less subs that can do more. Like the rest of the services, going more for quality rather than quantity.

One thing I must say about planning. Original plans and how plans evolve are two different things. Whatever your original plans was, 5 to 10 years from now, circumstances and reconsiderations may have forced it to evolve.

AIP is not the wonder solution people might like to think. When using AIP, you're not exactly quiet, and a sub on AIP is still a lot slower than a nuclear sub.

The PLAN will definitely need SSKs for littoral operations, not just in its homeland but also that at potential threats, since it is literally surrounded by countries in the seas. I wonder if they will include special forces or spy insertions. China's very geographic nature means it cannot go into the blue seas without taking care of brown water control first. In fact, the huge chain of these countries from Indonesia to Japan represents the world's largest and most diverse littoral environment, then add China's immensely rugged coastline at that. It is very interesting to note that the three ESF sub bases are located in littoral waters if you check them in GE. The depth of the waters may make it inaccessible or risky for large nuclear subs.
crobato is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #969
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 78
beijingcar is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

I agree with you on these points. BTW, if the mainland were to take over Taiwan, then you will see more SSNs as compared to SSKs being put into service. We already seen picture of old 033 or 035 being used as special OP. The fact they keep some of these old boats around maybe for the reason of mine laying and Special forces. As for personal, the biggest problem facing the PLAN in that area is in their surface fleet, not in their SUB fleet.
beijingcar is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #970
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 339
Skywatcher is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Any upgrades to the 093 (or future successors) would involve massive quieting upgrades. If necessary, they could also modify a subclass to deal with littoral issues if necessary.
Skywatcher is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #971
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia/China/Hong Kong
Posts: 348
PrOeLiTeZ is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

AIP system weren't designed neccesarly for increase in speed, it was to extend its underwater durations longer, needing less surface recharge then non AIP system subs. Diesel subs would be useful in the shallow waters of Hong Kong stationed as defensive subs.

In PLAN case moving from defensive nations for centuries their are no protecting their interest and manuevering to a more offensive combined defensive role.

Having Yuan/Song stationed as coastal defensive subs to protect crucial harbours and ports will further in if Subs get through you got you 022 as the backup. While the 093 acts as the foward defensive stations to protect China interest or act as spearheads for naval assaults or escorts.

How I relate this like NHL you got you blockers, quarterbacks and runner
PrOeLiTeZ is offline  
Old 01-22-2008   #972
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 272
flyzies is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
Who are you defending from? Submarines or ships? If you are defending against ships, the PLAN seems to building a horde of 022s (some in the CDF is estimating more than 80+ have been built). It is against subs, a small surface vessel like a corvette with ASW capability can do it faster and at much less the cost. Remember the advantage of any surface vessel is their speed and ability to surge and concentrate in numbers at a given area.

And remember, if you are able to project power in the first place, you don't need much of a coastal defense at all. Power projection takes care of coastal defense itself. Note the United States Navy.
The 022s will definitely be effective against ships yes. But ASW tech in PLAN could do with alot more improvement right now...esp on surface vessels anyways. So in the current situation the best way of defending against a sub is to use another sub...which is exactly why PLAN will keep SSKs running IMO. At least until its ASW tech matures and they build the corvettes you described...

Power projection eventually takes care of coastal defence, and that is PLAN's ultimate goal I believe...to use power projection force to handle the bulk of navys work. Unfortunately it is going to be quite some time before they achieve it.
Moreover, I think the geographical nature of seas surrounding China demands PLAN to be very capable in littoral water warfare.

You really hit the nail in this one of your later posts...
Quote:
The PLAN will definitely need SSKs for littoral operations, not just in its homeland but also that at potential threats, since it is literally surrounded by countries in the seas. I wonder if they will include special forces or spy insertions. China's very geographic nature means it cannot go into the blue seas without taking care of brown water control first. In fact, the huge chain of these countries from Indonesia to Japan represents the world's largest and most diverse littoral environment, then add China's immensely rugged coastline at that. It is very interesting to note that the three ESF sub bases are located in littoral waters if you check them in GE. The depth of the waters may make it inaccessible or risky for large nuclear subs.
flyzies is offline  
Old 01-23-2008   #973
New Member
 
Raptoreyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Raptoreyes is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese sub thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by bd popeye View Post
Darth Sidious baby..got an answer for you..my son , a sonar tech in the USN, once told me this...I will para-phrase..."the best(safest)place for a Chinese sub is in it's homeport"

I keep reading these threads about the 092 & 093. Does anyone have any real, not "P S", pictures of either boat? If so please post.
I have heard that most Chinese conventional battery and fuel cell boats make more noise then then US Nuclear boats of the LA and SeaWolf class. Its my understanding that most Chinese conventional boats have a noise level relative to current US/British passive sonar detection similar to early model Sturgeon SSN's retired from the US inventory against sonar of the period it was considered contemporary However the source is one I can only rate as moderately reliable.

We could have it as a rule of thumb that Chinese boats will be much much nosier then their western counterparts. During the Cold War Russian SSBN's were kept in bastions surrounded by neting and heavily mines fields with multiple SSN protectors, because the soviet government was not confident they could avoid detection of the American LA class boats. While soviet subtech sometimes surpassed American subs in dive depth, and top speed the soviet never really made a boat that came very close in quieting and number of weapons reloads/weapons range. The Akula SSB Oscar SSGN and Sierra SSN boats are said to have closed the gap somewhat.

Given all that how much better do the Chinese expect to do then the Russians did? Have the Chinese borrowed enough technology from America to avoid having their boats taken out at an embarrassing kill ratio vs US Subs should a subtitle naval war erupt. Due to the nature of submarine warfare attrition is not a bennift to the Chinese as it just means the undersea portion of the USN has more to shoot at with the same risk factor per engagement.
Raptoreyes is offline  
Old 01-23-2008   #974
Senior Member
 
AssassinsMace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,339
AssassinsMace is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese submarines thread

It's apropos that information is about as dated as the post replied to. Kitty Hawk anyone?
AssassinsMace is offline  
Old 01-23-2008   #975
New Member
 
Raptoreyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Raptoreyes is on a distinguished road
Re: Chinese sub thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_C View Post
Hey bd popeye, just pretend that u r a desiel sub captain and u get close enough to ur enemy undetected... u let lose ur weapons etc... how do u think a desiel sub get escape or survive afterwards. What do u think would be a tactic for survival in such a situation?
If your captain of a conventional sub your only possible means of survival AFTER launch would be to fire just above a strong thermal layer launch a noise maker and then duck under the layer within seconds of firing your ordinance. If your a Chinese boat trying to use your Vertical launch Tubes, then this option does not work most of the time but for torpedo's I would give this sort of attack run a 5-10% chance at the most for the firing conventional sub to escape. (assuming they the sub fires at an American surface group but better odds if they fire at commerse and avoid military vessels)

Unfortunately any conventional sub I know of is quite range limited without making HUGE amounts of noise and snorkeling is at best an imperfect solution in high seas. If water covers the snork even for a moment you will just about feel your eyes coming out of your sockets at the sudden drop in pressure as the noisy battery charging engines suck up air.
Raptoreyes is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13