SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

Alexander VS Qin dynasty

This is a discussion on Alexander VS Qin dynasty within the Military History forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; anyone seen the film Alexander and Hero (both are old films) from the film, we know the way how this ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Military History

China Defence Today Forum


Military History Forum for Chinese Military History, chinese armed forces & weapons technology history

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2009   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
handifei880210 is on a distinguished road
Alexander VS Qin dynasty

anyone seen the film Alexander and Hero (both are old films)
from the film, we know the way how this two troops fight.
spears of Macedonia or bow of the Qin dynasty, which will be the winner
(old topic, just like rome phalanx and han dynasty)
handifei880210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,169
pla101prc is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

well ummm you do realize the Qin army is like 10 times bigger than the macedonian army right? but not all of them are professional though.

Qin's bow will give them an early advantage, but if the Macedonians have enough soldiers left to get close, than its hard to tell.

you have to remember Alexander has a really good calvary as well. but again Qin's bow can take em out at a pretty far range and calvary werent that effective without stirrups.

in Shi Ji it is recorded that Wei had the best armour and prolly a pretty good phalanx as well, but they were still no match for Qin's army. so i guess Qin must have something that can defeat those phalanx.

overall in real life Qin would obviously win but if you have the same number of troops from each side then its hard to tell.
pla101prc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #3
Senior Member
 
FriedRiceNSpice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,422
FriedRiceNSpice is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Quote:
you have to remember Alexander has a really good calvary as well. but again Qin's bow can take em out at a pretty far range and calvary werent that effective without stirrups.
In ancient times, cavalry was the bane of skirmishers and missile troops. In fact, cavalry evolved from a light mobile force tasked with eliminating such troops. It was only later on, after the invention of the stirrup did heavy cavalry forces make their appearance.

Quote:
well ummm you do realize the Qin army is like 10 times bigger than the macedonian army right? but not all of them are professional though.
Alexander defeated a million-man Persian force.

Quote:
in Shi Ji it is recorded that Wei had the best armour and prolly a pretty good phalanx as well, but they were still no match for Qin's army. so i guess Qin must have something that can defeat those phalanx.
The Macedonian infantrymen were not even very heavily armored. They prevailed through superior training and tactics.

In the end though, I believe that the Qin forces do have the advantage. Terrain will be a major factor in deciding the victor though. On open plains, even with Macedonian cavalry I believe the Qin will easily be victorious.

Last edited by FriedRiceNSpice; 06-12-2009 at 04:38 PM.
FriedRiceNSpice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
handifei880210 is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

a million-men? you sure? you mean the whole campaign or just one battle?
handifei880210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
handifei880210 is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

i search the internet, the result show me that the number of Persian army is 0.24 ~ 0.25 million in one battle, may be you mean a million-men in the whole campaign?
handifei880210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #6
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

By studying the Terra Cotta army of the Qin, archeologists are able to ascertain that the Qin Army also uses formations similar to Macedonian Phalanx, that using 18 to 21" pikes.

With matrices of pikemen and crossbows, the Qin Army resembles more like the Swiss army in the 16th Century.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,169
pla101prc is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

there is no way persia had a million man army. and i have said this before but defeating the persian army maybe great but it is not as hard as you think. first of all they had an idiotic leader which makes things ten times easier. second of all their army was consisted of soldiers from different states so they had different ways of fighting, you end up with a bow of salad that cant even hold themselves together. also we must not forget that xenophon fought his way right across persia with just 10000men...it shows you how crappy the persian army is...with the exception of the immortals.
pla101prc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #8
New Member
 
Raptoreyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Raptoreyes is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
By studying the Terra Cotta army of the Qin, archeologists are able to ascertain that the Qin Army also uses formations similar to Macedonian Phalanx, that using 18 to 21" pikes.

With matrices of pikemen and crossbows, the Qin Army resembles more like the Swiss army in the 16th Century.
Many of the comments so far assume a fairly comparable supply situation and equally skilled commanders. While this is fun because it forces a focus on hardware, decisive factors would include terrain, leadership, intelligence gathering, who was invading whom, logistics and support of the local population.

Let us assume for this that Alexander was invading and the Qin were defending (at least initially). Most forum participants seem to unconsciously take that line anyway. Next let us get a list of the sorts of commanders that the Qin would field against Alexander and let us assume the first commander the Qin field fails against Alexander before the Qin tap their best talent against the legendary western commander. Until we know more about who Alexander would be fighting (once the Qin understood the true magnitude of the threat). Then we could talk about the differing known psychology of Alexander vs ??? of the Qin.

One question I would have is the state of Chinese military rocketry at the time. While not very effective in terms of destruction, if invented by then the Qin would have an excellent means of disordering Alexanders best cavalry units. This was similar to the problems Alexanders army had with those featuring war elephants. (elephants apparently scare the heck out of horses, according to historical records).

As for terrain China's is very flat and open on the whole, but is it so in the region that Alexander would most likely enter from? The Chinese would initially have an advantage over knowledge of terrain and local support, but not for a very long time. Alexander was extremely adept at the politics of "winning hearts and minds" in a way no modern army or commander has ever been. (a possible exception of Douglas MacArthur administering postwar Japan which in any case was much smaller then Alexanders Persian domains).

For this discussion to really sizzle we should determine the most likely scenarios under which ancient east and west would fight. Would the first Emperior of the Qin more likely be in his prime during Alexanders invasion or be weeks from deaths door by the time Alexander made it to as far India and China. Can we assume that if Alexander drove for China first he might have avoided the disease that weakened him in his abortive India invasion?

I hope this post inspires additional research and a very through discussion as I think it just might.
Raptoreyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #9
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Rocketry didn't exist in China that time and won't be for another thousand years.

Of far greater concern is that China as a civilization has mastered steel mass production, though not for weapons at first but for farm implementation. By using mass produced steel for farm tools to blow fields and build canals, China became an agriculture super power like no other in the ancient world, which led to an enormous population increase, the reason why China is still the most populous country in the world today.

Qin is a very blood thirsty and ambitious army. Its a literal decapitating machine. They chop heads here and there of prisoners, captives and general population. There is a head quota going on which means more heads, the higher the stature and there are head quotas for officer promotion. You can imagine the sheer terror this army evokes on its opponents.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,169
pla101prc is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptoreyes View Post
Many of the comments so far assume a fairly comparable supply situation and equally skilled commanders. While this is fun because it forces a focus on hardware, decisive factors would include terrain, leadership, intelligence gathering, who was invading whom, logistics and support of the local population.

Let us assume for this that Alexander was invading and the Qin were defending (at least initially). Most forum participants seem to unconsciously take that line anyway. Next let us get a list of the sorts of commanders that the Qin would field against Alexander and let us assume the first commander the Qin field fails against Alexander before the Qin tap their best talent against the legendary western commander. Until we know more about who Alexander would be fighting (once the Qin understood the true magnitude of the threat). Then we could talk about the differing known psychology of Alexander vs ??? of the Qin.

One question I would have is the state of Chinese military rocketry at the time. While not very effective in terms of destruction, if invented by then the Qin would have an excellent means of disordering Alexanders best cavalry units. This was similar to the problems Alexanders army had with those featuring war elephants. (elephants apparently scare the heck out of horses, according to historical records).

As for terrain China's is very flat and open on the whole, but is it so in the region that Alexander would most likely enter from? The Chinese would initially have an advantage over knowledge of terrain and local support, but not for a very long time. Alexander was extremely adept at the politics of "winning hearts and minds" in a way no modern army or commander has ever been. (a possible exception of Douglas MacArthur administering postwar Japan which in any case was much smaller then Alexanders Persian domains).

For this discussion to really sizzle we should determine the most likely scenarios under which ancient east and west would fight. Would the first Emperior of the Qin more likely be in his prime during Alexanders invasion or be weeks from deaths door by the time Alexander made it to as far India and China. Can we assume that if Alexander drove for China first he might have avoided the disease that weakened him in his abortive India invasion?

I hope this post inspires additional research and a very through discussion as I think it just might.
it complicates things way to much that way. if you include all those stuff then i say Qin wins, war has always been a battle of the countries' military, economy, leadership and whole bunch of other stuff. the talent of Chinese emperors is defined by his ability to keep his subordinates subordinate...its very rare to have good emperors that are super talented at military on a tactic level in China, you have Li Shimin of Tang, Zhao Kuangyin of Song, Zhu Yuanzhang of Ming, Xuanye of Qing, and Mao Zedong of PRC...those are the only ones that can match Alexander's talent. the Qin emperor is nowhere close in that catgory...what he has is a really good pool of talent and a social and political system that is designed to fight wars. but still, it complicates things way too much due to all the political considerations you have to make, so i say keep it to the tactical level.
pla101prc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,169
pla101prc is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
Rocketry didn't exist in China that time and won't be for another thousand years.

Of far greater concern is that China as a civilization has mastered steel mass production, though not for weapons at first but for farm implementation. By using mass produced steel for farm tools to blow fields and build canals, China became an agriculture super power like no other in the ancient world, which led to an enormous population increase, the reason why China is still the most populous country in the world today.
i thought Qin was able to make better copper weapons than steel at the time?
pla101prc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #12
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Qin mainly uses bronze weapons, even though its opponents were actually using steel weapons. The reason why is that steel is prized, and people thought they could make faer better use of it in the farms and canals, a policy that did pay off.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,169
pla101prc is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
Qin mainly uses bronze weapons, even though its opponents were actually using steel weapons. The reason why is that steel is prized, and people thought they could make faer better use of it in the farms and canals, a policy that did pay off.
haha that;s what i meant, bronze not copper.

the historians were making reference to the assassination attempt, how Qin had the technology to make really long swords...
pla101prc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009   #14
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
ccL1 is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

The Persians did not have a million man army in a single battle. I believe the largest they had was at the Battle of Issus, where they had about 300,000 (or a bit more) -- an army which Alexander defeated anyways with 10 times less troops.

If I were a betting man, I would place my money on Alexander and the Macedonians. The guy had the skill, intelligence, and strategic perception to defeat anyone. Plus his troops, especially his Companion Cavalry, were just awesome.

I'm not saying I'm 100% correct. I could totally be wrong, but if I were forced to choose, I would choose Alexader and the Macedonians.
ccL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009   #15
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Mightypeon is on a distinguished road
Re: Alexander VS Qin dynasty

I woudl assume that Logistics (hell, the Logistic train would go through some very nasty terrain) would assure a victory by the defender.
Mightypeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
boring topic

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1903 British-Tibet,China War maozedong Military History 0 06-24-2008 12:22 PM
Tibet's history-from CCTV maozedong Military History 1 06-24-2008 07:46 AM
Western Rome vs Eastern Tsin Dynasty Dynasty warrior Military History 1 07-16-2007 10:54 AM
Altan Khan and the Ming Dynasty cliveersknell Military History 8 05-06-2007 11:56 PM
Aincent Chinese Warfare Pic Thread Kampfwagen Military History 15 01-31-2006 09:56 PM


vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13