Page 156 of 182 FirstFirst ... 56106116126146151152153154155156157158159160161166 ... LastLast
Results 2,326 to 2,340 of 2729
Like Tree37Likes

J-20... The New Generation Fighter

This is a discussion on J-20... The New Generation Fighter within the Members' Club Room forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Courtesy of: starikki -- CJDBY Picture -- Even Higher Angle View_Left: Picture -- Even Higher Angle View_Right: What do you ...

  1. #2326
    GreenestGDP's Avatar
    GreenestGDP is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    56

    Lightbulb Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Courtesy of: starikki -- CJDBY


    Picture -- Even Higher Angle View_Left:





    Picture -- Even Higher Angle View_Right:




    What do you think??
    Last edited by GreenestGDP; 01-06-2011 at 12:16 PM.

  2. #2327
    Jeff Head's Avatar
    Jeff Head is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Idaho - Beautiful Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    5,588

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by kwiekie View Post
    Live video
    Great video of taxi testsing...thanks. I will repost on other forums.




  3. #2328
    GreenestGDP's Avatar
    GreenestGDP is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    56

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Picture: J20 -- T50 -- F22 --- Side by Side
    Last edited by GreenestGDP; 01-06-2011 at 12:17 PM.

  4. #2329
    Roger604's Avatar
    Roger604 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,175

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Maggern View Post
    Do they have any proof that Chinese avionics are a generation behind Russian ones?
    Quote Originally Posted by siegecrossbow View Post
    Any one could pull stuff out of his/her rearend. I can say that the Eurofighter is inferior to the J-10B just because it doesn't even employ DSI inlets. We all can make stupid statements like that without responsibility.
    Quote Originally Posted by Quickie View Post
    They don't have to. They know that the average reader know nuts about military technology, especially that of some specific country. The important thing is write something that really sells, something that's the kind of stuff, no matter how inaccurate it's, you would expect your readers to enjoy reading.
    You need to look specifically at the name of the person who wrote the Telegraph article and read the byline carefully to understand why they are spinning it this way.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maggern View Post
    I'm rather thinking....remember the first space walk? They had one indigenous space suit and one imported russian one in use up there. One for backup and one for doing the prestige stuff. Perhaps they're doing the same here. One model with AL-31F to do the basic stuff to make sure everything works, and then have one with an indigenous engine to do the show-offing to the big-shots.

    And although I'm no engineer, I seriously doubt they could throw around engines just like that, so it's likely to be on different prototypes. I'm sure it's possible to change engines, but that would surely require some heavy infrastructure and be time-consuming, not something a couple of guys with a forklift and a screwdriver could do on the tarmac.

    EDIT: Again about the engines...perhaps they have one with an indigenous engine, but they are unsure how well it would work (new model?), and don't want the testing for the other systems of the aircraft be hindered by a faulty engine, so they have another one with a proven engine so they're sure they can continue testing the plane even if no indigenous power plants are satisfying.
    Agreed, I think they already test flew using FWS10A engines and now they are using AL-31F engines for "public test flight." Or vice-versa.

    That would also explain why there is so much taxiing! They have to do everything twice. And it would also explain why Andrei Chang swears it is not AL-31F and he recognizes the sound of AL-31F.
    Last edited by Roger604; 01-06-2011 at 12:25 PM.

  5. #2330
    andyhugfan's Avatar
    andyhugfan is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    76

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Head View Post
    Great video of taxi testsing...thanks. I will repost on other forums.





    Allright, 2nd pic is PS for sure.

  6. #2331
    Jeff Head's Avatar
    Jeff Head is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Idaho - Beautiful Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    5,588

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by andyhugfan View Post
    Allright, 2nd pic is PS for sure.
    No doubt, buit I thought I would post it anyway...IMHO, they will fly the J-20 soon, so we will not have long to wait for the real thing.

  7. #2332
    MwRYum's Avatar
    MwRYum is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Timing wise it's very possible to be happen before Secretary of Defense Robert Gates' visit to China, which will be on Jan 9th-12th, given the current atmosphere China no doubt want to have something to "show", in a way.
    J-20's successful first flight would fit just nice.

  8. #2333
    cn_habs is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    459

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    If I were them, I'd just make it on the 9th when Gates arrives.

  9. #2334
    vesicles's Avatar
    vesicles is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,524

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Man! that second pic almost gave me a heart attack... I thought I missed it...

    PS. I thought I quoted the pics above, but I didn't. I was talking about the PSed photo of J-20 in the air..

  10. #2335
    KYli's Avatar
    KYli is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    498

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    New Pics





    Last edited by KYli; 01-06-2011 at 01:17 PM.

  11. #2336
    Engineer's Avatar
    Engineer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,329

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Does anybody else think that the unpainted patch on the right side of the cockpit is reserved for a retractable refueling probe?

  12. #2337
    KYli's Avatar
    KYli is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    498

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    More Pics






  13. #2338
    Hendrik_2000's Avatar
    Hendrik_2000 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,053

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Intel Is Slow But Not Wrong Pentagon Says
    Posted by David A. Fulghum at 1/6/2011 10:41 AM CST
    Intel Is Slow But Not Wrong Pentagon Says


    Seeing the J-20 stealth fighter with its nose wheel off the ground in a high-speed taxi test in Dec. was a shock to everyone except the Chinese, apparently.

    The immediate impact of the new fighter’s pre-flight tests and the development of other advanced conventional weapons was downplayed by Vice Admiral David J. Dorsett, deputy Chief of Naval Operations for information dominance and director of naval intelligence (N2/N6).

    “I’m more worried about Chinese game-changing capabilities in non-kinetic [areas such as information dominance, network invasion and electronic warfare],” he says. “I am most concerned about China’s focus on trying to develop [the ability] to dominate the electromagnetic spectrum, to counter space capabilities and to conduct cyberactivities.

    “The other concern I have is China’s ability to become operationally efficient in a sophisticated, complex, joint war-fighting environment,” Dorsett says. “I don’t see China with those capabilities now. I do see them delivering individual components and weapons systems [like J-20 and DF-21D], but until they acquire proficiency [with them] how competent are they really going to be?”

    The Chinese military’s self-proclaimed timeline is mid-century, Dorsett says. In that context, he denies that the Pentagon is overestimating its threat.

    “I’m not alarmed,” Dorsett says. “I am intrigued by developments and am quite interested in the quantities and different types of technologies that we didn’t expect or overestimated.”

    There is a marked relationship between China’s booming economy and its military buildup, he points out. But there are obvious shortfalls.

    “The Chinese don’t have a great integrated ISR capability or an anti-submarine capability at all,” Dorsett says. “They don’t demonstrate a sophisticated level in joint warfighting. They are at the early stages of operational proficiency across the board. What would be dangerous is underestimating the timeline of synchronizing these various element.”

    Other Washington-based intelligence officials say they are watching the J-20’s testing with interest.

    “They have done several high-speed taxis [with the nosewheel off the ground,” says another veteran analyst. “They could still be working out some kinks before they try an actual first flight.”

    There also are a lot of unknowns about the aircraft’s real importance.

    “Operational impact is a tough call to make at this point, given that this plane, even if it flies, is not going to be full-up 5th gen [aircraft],” the analyst says. “In essence, this is going to be a novelty for the next decade before it starts to roll off the series production lines and gets to the line units in any numbers that would impact any of our mission planning. A lot of things can happen, good and bad, between now and then to either speed this up or severely put the brakes on things. As far as radar cross-section goes, this is not an F-22, nor should we be thinking that they are going for low RCS right out of the chute,” the analyst says.

    An Achilles' Heel of Chinese high performance aircraft has been engines. The Chinese have failed so far to produce an indigenous engine that has the performance they need for a world-class fighter. Under earlier Chinese military doctrine, which favored mass over advanced technology, the People's Liberation Army Air Force was equipped with adapted versions of 1950s Soviet designs with old-technology engines. Analysts differ in their assessments of China’s first high-performance engine, the Shenyang WS-10, but recent images of the J-11B fighter—China’s bootleg version of the Sukhoi Su-30—appears to show a nozzle design that differs visibly from the Russian AL-31F and resembles that of WS-10 engines displayed at air shows.

    Dorsett says the J-20 program’s existence was known, but “One of the things that is … true is that we have been pretty consistent in underestimating the delivery and initial operational capability of Chinese technology weapons systems.” Two recent examples of misanalyses have been the J-20 fighter, the DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile, a high-performance fighter engine design and advanced air combat missile.

    “How far along are they?,” he says. “I don’t know. They clearly have an initial [J-20] prototype. Is it advanced and how many trials, tests and demos do they have to go through before it becomes operational? That’s not clear to me.”

    However, the evidence of the design’s sophistication is mounting.

    The J-20 is designed to carry new weaponry with some of it tucked away internally. China is continuing an effort to expand the military’s air-to-air missile inventory. Although Avic officials so far have refused to discuss what comes after the PL-12A radar-guided medium-range missile, new information suggests work is progressing on several enhanced versions. These include a combined solid-motor, ramjet-powered missile, the PL-21. The missile, with a single inlet for the ramjet, may have undergone ground tests last year.

    Work may be slightly more advanced on the PL-12D, a ramjet-upgrade of the basic PL-12 with more modest changes to the airframe and less end-game maneuverability than the PL-21 would feature. Chinese industry also appears to be working on the PL-12C with smaller after control fins for internal carriage on the J-20. The mid-body fins are believed to be similar to the basic PL-12 and PL-12B with improved electronic counter-countermeasures.

    The close-in battle would use the PL-10, whose design may resemble South Africa’s Denel A-Darter.

    China’s ability to increasingly use standoff weapons, also in air-to-ground and anti-ship missile roles, is already affecting planning among potential adversaries. Japanese defense officials, for example, are showing interest in missiles with greater ranges for engaging Chinese threats earlier, and there are also discussion in the U.S. about the need for weapons with greater engagement capability.

  14. #2339
    bladerunner is offline Banned Idiot
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Xin Xi Lan
    Posts
    3,000

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Originally Posted by vesicles View Post
    I don't think it's technical. They wouldn't let the world know about the whole thing unless they are absolutely sure it would work. I am still wondering why people believe today is the day for flight test ...
    I wouldnt be surprised if they have already had a secret test flight, after all they wouldnt want a stuff up in front of all the VIP's

  15. #2340
    bd popeye's Avatar
    bd popeye is offline The Last Jedi
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids Iowa
    Posts
    15,830

    Re: J-20... The New Generation Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by andyhugfan View Post
    hey, is there a welcome thread for new members? I cant find one, or they are closed.
    Yes...here's a link;

    New members introductions - New members Introduce yourselves
    Be sure to check out...


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    don't forget


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"

Similar Threads

  1. Chinese AAM
    By tphuang in forum Air Force
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 05-25-2013, 09:58 AM
  2. New Chinese "F-X" single-engine fighter?
    By AssassinsMace in forum Air Force
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 02-03-2011, 03:10 AM
  3. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-20-2010, 09:56 PM
  4. The Richard Fisher Strikes Back!
    By AssassinsMace in forum Strategic Defense
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-03-2008, 11:19 PM
  5. U.S.built Iranian aircraft
    By DPRKPTboat in forum World Armed Forces
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 05:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13