Page 100 of 202 FirstFirst ... 506070909596979899100101102103104105110130140150200 ... LastLast
Results 1,486 to 1,500 of 3026
Like Tree1736Likes

Chinese Economics Thread

This is a discussion on Chinese Economics Thread within the Members' Club Room forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by Hendrik_2000 Amazing how you can transform the life of people by building roads, bridges, car factory GM ...

  1. #1486
    ahho is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    446

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik_2000 View Post
    Amazing how you can transform the life of people by building roads, bridges, car factory

    GM Bets Big on Rural China Markets

    Success of Microvans Prompts Push to Manufacture Other No-Frills Vehicles for Emerging Consumers.

    GM China Shifts Focus to Rural Demand for No-Frills Vehicles - WSJ.com

    By NORIHIKO SHIROUZU

    HUANGZHONG VILLAGE, China—Farmer Zhang Zuoming and his extended family's growing fleet of microvans in this dusty village in China's far west explains why General Motors Co. is rushing to recalibrate its China strategy.

    As a decade-long boom in car sales along the prosperous coast eases, inland villages like this one have become the new sales frontier for GM and other foreign auto makers.

    Inexpensive microvans, on a Liuzhou, China, assembly line, have helped wheat farmer Zhang Zuoming become an entrepreneur.

    Huangzhong villagers are part of a larger swath of people in less developed parts of China becoming rich enough to buy a no-frills car. Their growing demand for cheap yet sturdy vehicles is at the heart of GM's strategy to double its sales in China to around five million units by 2015 from about 2.35 million in 2010.

    Roughly half of all the vehicles that GM sells in China are Wuling microvans, made by a company in which GM has a 44% stake. The other primary partner in the venture is SAIC Motor Corp., GM's main joint venture partner in China, which owns 50%. The rest is owned by a local company in southern China where SAIC GM Wuling Automobile Co. is based.

    As General Motors makes a push into China's automotive hinterland, SAIC-GM Wuling executive Scott Tien introduces WSJ's Norihiko Shirouzu to the little truck that's come to dominate the country's rural roadways.
    .
    Wuling is now scouting for a location to build a third manufacturing complex to meet explosive demand. With GM's help, the Wuling joint venture also launched a second low-cost brand called Baojun (which means "treasured horse") last year. Its first product, a sedan called the Baojun 630, was recently unveiled at the Shanghai auto show.

    GM estimates that the market for low-cost cars in China already amounts to six million vehicles a year—bigger than major auto markets such as France and Japan. It is dominated by local companies including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Chery Automobile Co.

    "The decade of 2000 to 2010 was an era marked by very dramatic growth on the coast. But real growth is going to happen now more toward the interior of the country," says Wuling Executive Vice President Matthew Tsien, a 28-year GM veteran who has been sent into China to improve Wuling's performance.

    Four years ago, Mr. Zhang lost his supplementary factory job as his employer for nearly two decades folded after failing to meet government environmental standards.

    The 2,000-yuan-a-year job—about $310—wasn't high-paying, but the 41-year-old didn't want to go back to his 500-yuan-a-year life as a full-time wheat farmer. The decision he made in 2007, to buy a $4,500 Wuling microvan, with government subsidies, transformed his life.

    View Full Image
    Norihiko Shirouzu/The Wall Street Journal
    Zhang Zuoming

    Today he drives his workhorse van, and a second Wuling model he added in 2008, to haul goods. He brings home 50,000 yuan a year and has used the new wealth to remodel his house and take his father and other relatives to Beijing for sightseeing. Mr. Zhang, his brothers and nephews in Huangzhong, 15 miles outside Xining, capital of the far-Western province of Qinghai, have since bought four more Wuling vans. Other villagers have followed suit.

    "My whole family needs to eat, and we totally count on these Wuling vans," Mr. Zhang says in his living room, gesturing toward one of the Wulings parked outside his house. "This has brought real happiness and joy around here." He was able to buy his second Wuling with a windfall profit he made when the government paid him compensation for some of his land it annexed to build a power plant.

    According to an estimate by U.S. consulting firm Alix Partners, the number of households in China with annual income of more than 60,000 yuan—a level deemed sufficient for a family to buy a no-frills car—is estimated to nearly double over the next four years to 65.6 million.


    .
    Since 2002, GM has been working with Wuling, a relatively unknown producer of microvans in Liuzhou, an industrial hub in the poor southern province of Guangxi. The move has paid off handsomely. Wuling has seen its sales surge nearly eight fold since 2002 to 1.15 million microvans last year.

    As sales growth slows in big cities on China's eastern seaboard—in part because of traffic-fighting restrictions on car sales and market saturation—GM and SAIC are making fresh moves to penetrate inland regions.

    GM's Mr. Tsien says the site for the new Wuling plant the joint venture is thinking about building most likely would be sited in an inland province like Sichuan. He says Wuling has already been adding capacity since late last year to the existing plants, a move that will boost the company's overall capacity to 1.3 million vehicles a year this year.

    GM and SAIC are so sure of the new Baojun brand's potential in inland Chinese cities, that they are ready to build an all-new factory dedicated to the vehicle in Liuzhou with capacity to produce 400,000 a year. The plant will start production by the end of 2012.

    "There's a massive market for people who want affordable vehicles," said Kevin Wale, head of GM's China operations.

    GM faces competition. A joint venture between Nissan Motor Co. and Dongfeng Motor Group Co., for example, has announced plans to launch a China-only brand, Qichen, which is due to start selling its own no-frills cars in 2012.

    Wuling began building mini farm trucks in the 1960s and entered a segment that has come to be known as "mini commercial vehicles," or microvans, in the mid-1980s with technological assistance from Japan's Mitsubishi Motors Corp. and Daihatsu Motor Co. SAIC invested in Wuling in 2001, and GM did so the following year.

    Since 2002, GM and SAIC helped Wuling improve what were spartan workhorse vehicles used primarily by farmers and small shop owners. They provided technology and made them more reliable and durable for the pot-holed roads they travel along.

    For a swelling tide of households in China who are now wealthy enough to buy cars, boxy Wuling vans come with bare-bone features. Some have one airbag as an option, and navigation systems are not offered at all. CD players, air-conditioning, power windows and power locks are all optional features.

    When GM first bought its stake in Wuling, the brand sold 147,000 vehicles that year and "was struggling to be profitable," Mr. Tsien says. It was an important investment for GM, but within the company it was hardly noticed.

    "If somebody were to mention [Wuling], I would not have known what it was, and I worked for GM," he says. "So clearly our significance has increased."

    Wuling is fast evolving into a centerpiece of GM's global strategy, as demand for its thrifty vans takes off.

    Another satisfied customer is Ba Peijun, who runs a small meat-delivery service in a rural village called Gongmazhuang outside the central Chinese city of Zhengzhou. The 48-year-old villager's business began taking off after he bought a Wuling van in 2004 for 36,500 yuan with loans from his sister and friends.

    "Wuling van quality is really great. It is sturdy, seldom needs repair," Mr. Ba said. "It can haul more cargo—more or less double what I was able to carry on my old van. It's of great help to my business." By 2008, thanks in part to the new van, Mr. Ba was able to save enough money to start a second business—a pancake restaurant. He has since bought a second car, a VW Santana.

    So many villagers in Gongmazhuang have purchased Wuling vans that people around the place often refer to it as Wuling Village.


    http://online.wsj.com/video/gm-china...C3B19C100.html
    Ah the wuling microvan and the microvan class in China is basically a good gap bridging vehicle. You can buy a new one at 50000 yuan and a used one for 20000 and it can get you a job as a contract driver or a family car. I never understand why North America never allow this class of car to be made here since it is a people mover. I know there is safety concern, but why are there double standards when you can pretty much import this thing

  2. #1487
    Schumacher is offline Banned Idiot
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,138

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    After suffering, and surviving, decades of sanctions, Cubans may finally be able to enjoy the benefits of booming oil prices, with some Chinese help in technology and credit.

    Vice-president hails energy ties with Cuba

    VARADERO, Cuba - Vice-President Xi Jinping said on Monday that he was delighted to see strengthened cooperation between China and Cuba in the petrochemical industry.

    Xi made the remarks while inspecting an oil drilling project in Varadero, about 130 kilometers from Havana.

    Great Wall Drilling Co (GWDC), a subsidiary of the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), has been working with Cuban oil companies to provide drilling services in the region.

    Accompanied by Cuban Vice-President Ramiro Valdes, Xi listened to introductions from Chinese and Cuban oil executives on bilateral cooperation in the petroleum industry.

    "I hope the cooperation (between the Chinese and Cuban petroleum industries) will be carried out on a solid basis to seek common benefits and a win-win situation," Xi said.

    Since August 2005, GWDC has drilled 63 wells along the coast from Havana to Varadero, of which 31 are contracted with Cuba's state petroleum company, CUPET, and the rest with other Cuban oil firms. Total output of petroleum and natural gas from these wells has reached 13 million barrels.

    GWDC is only responsible for drilling, with Cuban oil companies take over the wells after this is completed.

    GWDC has five drilling rigs and six technical service teams in Cuba, employing around 400 Chinese and Cuban workers.

    Cuban Minister of Basic Industry Tomas Benitez Hernandez said that CNPC has been doing a good job in protecting the environment in its drilling, pointing out all the work has been conducted on the coastline between Havana and Varadero, two important tourist cities for the Caribbean nation.

    Bilateral cooperation in the petroleum industry is a role model of cooperation between the two countries, he said.

    It also reflects the friendship between the two nations, he said.

    Besides working with GWDC, Cuban petroleum companies have also bought technological equipment from CNPC, he said, adding that it has been functioning well.

    Cuba is also working with other Chinese partners to expand the nation's oil refining capacity with funding from China Development Bank.

    These oil refining and liquefied gas projects are of great importance to Cuba, said Hernandez. They will help change the country's energy structure, he added.

    He expressed Cuba's willingness to cooperate with Chinese companies, citing great potential in areas such as the Gulf of Mexico.

    Companies from Canada, Spain, Angola and Vietnam are also cooperating with Cuba's petroleum industry.

    One of the 13 economic and technological cooperation agreements signed between China and Cuba on June 6 involves expanded cooperation between CNPC and CUPET.

    Xi wound up his busy three-day trip to Cuba on Tuesday morning.

    His four-nation tour, which started on June 1 in Italy, will also take him to Uruguay and Chile, whose trade with China has been expanding fast in the past few years.

    China is the second largest trade partner of Uruguay after Brazil, while China is Chile's largest trade partner and top export destination.

    China Daily
    bluewater2012 likes this.

  3. #1488
    Bltizo's Avatar
    Bltizo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The People's Republic of Socialist Romanticism
    Posts
    3,965

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Soo... I'm not taking this article very seriously. What do you guys think?

    China's 'Wealth Drain': New Signs That Rich Chinese Are Set on Emigrating - TIME


    China's 'Wealth Drain': New Signs That Rich Chinese Are Set on Emigrating
    By Xin Haiguang / Economic Observer / WorldCrunch Saturday, June 11, 2011


    BEIJING — Is China facing a "Wealth Drain"? Do too many of the best and brightest — and above all, richest — Chinese dream of packing up their accumulated capital, and going to live abroad?

    According to a new study, a majority of Chinese who have more than 10 million Yuan ($1.53 million) worth of individual assets find the idea of real—estate investment a lot less tempting than so—called "investment emigration." Nearly 60% of people interviewed claim they are either considering emigration through investment overseas, or have already completed the process, according to the 2011 Private Wealth Report on China published by China Merchants Bank and a business consulting firm Bain & Company. The richer you are, the study suggests, the likelier it is that you resort to emigration. And among those who possess more than 100 million yuan, 27 % have already emigrated while 47% are considering leaving.
    (See: "On the Cutting Edge — China's Extraordinary Buildings")

    The fact that more and more rich Chinese are seeking to emigrate is turning into a hot topic in China, and statistics prove that the trend is a real one. According to Caixin online, a Chinese website specialized in finance, the compound annual growth rate of overseas investment by Chinese individuals approached 100% between 2008 and 2010. The compound growth rate of the Chinese who used investments to emigrate to the United States in the past five years is 73%.

    So why are wealthy Chinese so eager to leave their country? The simplest answer is that there are a lot of things in China that even the richest cannot buy (emigration is obviously not one of them). China's rich are fond of saying that nothing "is a problem if money can solve it." Among the irresolvable problems that spark emigration, there are material ones, and emotional ones.

    The former includes issues like laws and regulations, the education system, social welfare, inheritance tax, quality of air, investing atmosphere, food safety, ability to travel, and so on. In short, these are the material factors that any State must provide to its people in order to ensure their happiness. In emerging countries such as China, these factors are still often found wanting.

    Emotional reasons behind rich people's immigration are generally linked to the lack of a sense of personal safety, including safety of personal wealth, as well as fear about an uncertain future.
    (See: "China Stamps Out Democracy Protests")

    It thus appears that it is a certain "lack of well—being" that is pushing wealthy Chinese to emigrate. The results of the Private Wealth Report are very much in line with other studies. A recent Gallop Wellbeing Survey showed that most Chinese people feel depressed, even as China has sky—high economic growth rates that Europe and America can only dream of. According to the survey, which asked respondents to choose between "thriving," "struggling," and "suffering" to describe their situation, only 12% think themselves as "thriving," while 17% describe themselves as "suffering," and 71% "struggling." The number of Chinese who feel that their life is improving is comparable to the number of Afghans and Yemeni who feel the same way, while the number of persons feeling they are "struggling" is approximately the same as in Haiti, Azerbaijan and Nepal.

    It is a paradox that, in a country where more and more people are getting richer by the day — albeit to the detriment of the poor, who have benefitted very little from the country's new wealth — the general feeling of well—being should remain at rock—bottom. The poor grumble while the rich flee.

    The truth is that, unless they emigrate, the wealthy have to suffer from the same causes of unhappiness as the poor. Take food safety. Last year, when a Chinese woman living in Canada was asked by the International Herald Tribune why she had left her country, she said it was because of the Sanlu (toxic baby milk) case, and also because of the "hatred against the rich." Her answer highlights the fact that, as the gap between the rich and the poor is getting wider, and the poor are complaining more and more, the rich are also getting more nervous. Some rich people even worry that the "redistribution of wealth might start all over again."


    Although the danger seems overblown for now, people are starting to wonder where the public hatred of the rich might lead. The wealthy also know that they bear some of the responsibility for the unequal distribution of wealth. The so—called "original sin of wealth" is not totally without foundation, and it is often difficult for the rich to stop enriching themselves. Fluctuating market conditions bring out a survival instinct that sometimes makes them commit illegal or immoral acts. Once they realize this, they often chose to avoid the trap by emigrating and starting afresh.

    The situation would not be as serious, of course, if the number of people deciding to leave were low. But once a few personal choices take the shape of a massive drain, the consequences of their departure on the economy and on society, through the example they set, can be dire.

    An even bigger cause of concern is that, when rich people pack their money and leave, not only are they no longer identifying with their country, but they are also avoiding their social obligations. While the reason behind these people's decision matters little, the undeniable fact is that they make money from this society, but they refuse to give anything back.

    Rich people who decide to move to a foreign country should know that, by doing so, they are stoking the dissatisfaction among those who stay behind. The poor get angrier because they cannot leave, and their hatred towards the remaining rich grows even bigger. This is the most corrosive thing that can happen to a society.
    I especially think the inherent idea that everyone wants to leave China is a bit awkward at best and wishful thinking at worst.
    Thoughts?
    Red Moon and bluewater2012 like this.
    CARRIER HAS ARRIVED! ^^

  4. #1489
    Player 0 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    255

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    ^It's overblown, Americans and Europeans who are wealthy often emigrate to other countries like Singapore or Hong Kong where they find living conditions better suited to their needs, should there be alarmist talk about this?

    In any case it's just another issue of creating reforms to meet the demands of market forces, lack of private schools, health and food safety regulations and wealth disparity need to be tackled anyway and if the government is unable to that successfully this is the result. This is all a very recent trend that has only been happening for the last couple of years anyone who jumps on this and inflates this as some kind of crisis that will cause China's downfall is just that: sensationalism, get back to me in the next ten years and see how the government responds and what the ultimate fate of this issue is.

  5. #1490
    AssassinsMace's Avatar
    AssassinsMace is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,668

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Brain drain... money... what else propaganda reasons are they going to think of next? They said that back during the 1997 Hong Kong handover. Oh and lets not forget how they acquired that money... They'll soon find the rules and regulations of the West even more hampering and the West will probably see what they do as criminal. China where the government controls the movement of people who can so easily leave? What happened to Kadeer's billions? If it were so easy to transfer money, why does the US complain about how American corporations can't take their money out of China? Who has said living in China is a picnic to reveal to the world that thought the opposite? That's why it sounds made up. What about all the Chinese that went back to China to start businesses. Look at some of the richest self-made female billionaires in the world that come from China. A couple of them were living in the US beforehand. Let's spin that.

    And beware of Time magazine. They recently merged with the Daily Beast and their editor Tina Brown had some dedication to women in power issue. I looked for what Chinese would be in there. Did I find half of the top twelve richest self-made female billionaires in the world that happen to come from China including number one? Nope, as far as I read. They had Hollywood celebrities. They had Oprah. They had JK Rowling lauded as one of the richest self-made women. You'd figure it would be a grand statement for women especially in light of the criticism of how women are treated in China but I certainly didn't see number one richest self-made woman in there at least. Who were in there? People I never heard of but I did notice the few in there had something in common. They all had a Westernized look. Now I get it. They weren't going to show the top richest self-made woman in there because she looked more like someone you'd walk by in Chinatown and not Wall Street or Rodeo Drive. Advertising that you can become one of the richest self-made women in the world in China doesn't work in their scheme of things.
    Last edited by AssassinsMace; 06-13-2011 at 12:48 AM.
    bluewater2012 likes this.

  6. #1491
    bladerunner is offline Banned Idiot
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Xin Xi Lan
    Posts
    3,000

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    The Chinese have been migrating for centuries, and all being well, will continue to do so.

  7. #1492
    RedMercury is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    971

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    The rich who are planning to "emmigrate" only really care about having a backup plan, i.e. citizenship in another country, so they can flee if they feel like it. They still plan to conduct their business in China, as it is a far better place to get rich-- not just because of the economic malaise much of the west is in, but the cultural familiarity and ease of doing business with the right connections (which they already have built up to get that rich, no point wasting that capital). Besides, they can try to do business in the west, but they will run into a lot of cultural differences, have to build connections from scratch, face different laws and regulations, and won't be able to bribe through it as readily. So really, "china" as a society isn't losing their capital, nor would it really miss their capital when foreigners are lining up to invest.

    As for food safety, environment etc, if they were rich, they didn't deal with that anyway; these were only problems for the poor and middle class.

    In an unrelated note, the sons and daughters of these new rich Chinese tend to be quite spoiled and utterly useless wastes of oxygen. Their wealth won't last more than a generation...
    Red Moon and bluewater2012 like this.

  8. #1493
    Martian's Avatar
    Martian is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    1,234

    China Bests Japan in Americans’ Eyes

    China Bests Japan in Americans’ Eyes - Japan Real Time - WSJ

    "China Bests Japan in Americans’ Eyes
    June 13, 2011, 8:42 PM JST
    By Anna Novick

    It’s official, at least as far as a Japanese government survey is concerned: Americans see China, rather than Japan, as their most important partner in Asia.


    A man in an American flag outfit watched the ceremony of lowering the flag in Tiananmen Square, Beijing, in May. (Getty Images)

    According to results from the 2011 edition of an annual opinion poll commissioned by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, some 39% of “general public” respondents selected China as “the most important partner of the U.S. in Asia,” while 31% chose Japan.

    While the 2010 version of the poll showed the Asian rivals tied with a 44% rating, the 2011 numbers, compiled from interviews with 1,200 citizens from February to March, represent a stark change compared with just three years ago. In 2008, 43% of the general public selected Japan as the most important partner for the U.S., while 34% plumped for China.

    The result of the poll, which the ministry commissioned the Gallup Organization to conduct, is part of a broader consultation on what the public, and opinion leaders, in the U.S. make of Japan. As well as the general public segment, pollsters also interviewed 200 opinion leaders for a separate set of results.

    The opinion leaders’ view of which country in Asia is the most important partner for the U.S. offers even more emphatic confirmation that trade relations, usually cited as the main reason for a preference for China, are increasingly carrying more weight than political or general ties with the U.S., usually cited as a reason for choosing Japan. Over the past three years’ surveys, opinion leaders’ preference for Japan has nearly halved, to 28% from 54%, while their preference for China increased to 46% from 38%. The results in part reflect China officially overtaking Japan as the world’s second-biggest economy earlier this year.

    In slightly better news for Tokyo, the ministry said, “The percentage who perceived Japan to be a dependable ally was 84% among the general public and was 90% among opinion leaders, high figures similar to last year’s poll.” And 77% of the general public and 87% of opinion leaders viewed cooperation between Japan and the U.S. as “excellent” or “good,” the ministry said.

    Other crumbs of comfort from the survey: Among the general public, Japan was viewed as “a country with great traditions and culture” (97%); “a country with a strong economy and high technology” (91%); “a country which launches new cultures such as animation, fashion, and cuisine” (88%) and “a country with beautiful nature” (85%).

    –Kenneth Maxwell contributed to this article."

    [Note: Thank you to "Kobo-Daishi" for the article link.]

  9. #1494
    Martian's Avatar
    Martian is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    1,234

    Hares and tortoises

    GDP growth: Hares and tortoises | The Economist

    Hares and tortoises
    Jun 13th 2011, 10:20 by The Economist online

    Which countries have had most, and least, GDP growth per person since 2001?

    FOR all its faults, GDP per person is still the measure that gives the best indicator of economic progress or lack thereof. The countries where GDP per head grew fastest between 2001 and 2010—Equatorial Guinea, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan—are all rich in natural resources, and were beneficiaries of the past decade’s boom in commodity prices. China is an exception to this rule, which makes its growth even more impressive. And while it usually helps to start relatively poor, a bad start does not necessarily result in success later on. Haiti and Zimbabwe have both explored how much ruin there is in a nation over the past decade and show little sign of improving. They are two of only 15 countries that have seen negative growth since 2001. Slow population growth also helps: although America's economy has grown considerably faster than Japan's since 2001, Japan’s population has shrunk while America's has risen. This means that income per head in Japan has grown almost as rapidly as in America over this period.

    Last edited by Martian; 06-13-2011 at 10:46 PM.

  10. #1495
    Mcsweeney is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    67

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Rich people wanting to emigrate to the USA is seriously nothing new. The first thing a Canadian does when he strikes it rich is move to the USA. Seriously, I'm struggling to think of a single extremely successful Canadian who didn't go to the US for warmer weather and lower taxes.

  11. #1496
    bd popeye's Avatar
    bd popeye is offline The Last Jedi
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids Iowa
    Posts
    15,842

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Ford breaks ground with new China plant - Yahoo! News

    WASHINGTON (AFP) – Ford Motor Company said Thursday it had broken new ground on a passenger car joint venture in China, which plans to double its capacity when it comes online in 2013.

    Changan Ford Mazda Automobile, whose new engine plant is located in Chongqing, central China, represents a $500 million investment. It will have a production capacity of 750,000 units per year.

    Its engines will equip Ford vehicles produced and sold in China.

    Ford intends to launch 15 new models in China by 2015, in a bid to gain a better presence in the biggest auto market in the world.

    The US automaker sold over 580,000 vehicles in China last year, compared to 2.35 million for its rival General Motors, a leader on the Chinese market.
    Martian likes this.
    Be sure to check out...


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    don't forget


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"

  12. #1497
    Red Moon is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    390

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bltizo View Post
    Soo... I'm not taking this article very seriously. What do you guys think?

    China's 'Wealth Drain': New Signs That Rich Chinese Are Set on Emigrating - TIME



    I especially think the inherent idea that everyone wants to leave China is a bit awkward at best and wishful thinking at worst.
    Thoughts?
    Quote Originally Posted by RedMercury View Post
    The rich who are planning to "emmigrate" only really care about having a backup plan, i.e. citizenship in another country, so they can flee if they feel like it. They still plan to conduct their business in China, as it is a far better place to get rich-- not just because of the economic malaise much of the west is in, but the cultural familiarity and ease of doing business with the right connections (which they already have built up to get that rich, no point wasting that capital). Besides, they can try to do business in the west, but they will run into a lot of cultural differences, have to build connections from scratch, face different laws and regulations, and won't be able to bribe through it as readily. So really, "china" as a society isn't losing their capital, nor would it really miss their capital when foreigners are lining up to invest.
    I agree with both of these statements, but I do think there *could* be an issue here. A book was published a couple of years ago titled "Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics". I did not read it, and I am basing my comment on my recollection of a very short and vague review which contained the phrase "latinamericanization of Chinese society". On top of this, the phrase was not accompanied by an explanation.

    Yet, I think I know what they meant! Latin American countries have been periodically afflicted with "capital flight", "brain drain", etc. The issue is not that "people" in general want to leave, but that there is a very big wealth gap, and the rich (who are also the educated, of course) are quite free to come and go -- with their money and their knowledge -- and do so whenever things become inconvenient for them.

    The problem is that this tends to limit the policy options for the various governments; the situation gives the rich a kind of trump card which tends to make the governments beholden to the rich.

    China is moving quite rapidly toward the internationalization of its currency, and we will soon see what effect this has on policy. Today, the Chinese government can control prices if it wishes to, it can stiffen labor laws, and in short, it can "make the rich pay" in ways no other "capitalist" country that I know of can. Will it still have this power in 5 or 10 years? Having such power gives China a distinct advantage, in my opinion.

    Happily, the Chinese government seems to estimate that it is not a serious problem, and that it will not loose "control" as a result of its reforms. They obviously know more than I do. Maybe China is just that much BIGGER and stronger than Latin American countries.

  13. #1498
    Spartan95's Avatar
    Spartan95 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    557

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bltizo View Post
    Soo... I'm not taking this article very seriously. What do you guys think?

    China's 'Wealth Drain': New Signs That Rich Chinese Are Set on Emigrating - TIME



    I especially think the inherent idea that everyone wants to leave China is a bit awkward at best and wishful thinking at worst.
    Thoughts?
    Well, if the rich got rich using less than legal means (graft, using unsafe practises/ingredients, etc), will it be surprising if they are trying to get out before they get prosecuted? Those that have made their big bucks may not have reason to stay if they have been using melamine in milk, used sub-standard materials for construction, received bribes, cooked the books, etc.

  14. #1499
    Red___Sword is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    824

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan95 View Post
    Well, if the rich got rich using less than legal means (graft, using unsafe practises/ingredients, etc), will it be surprising if they are trying to get out before they get prosecuted? Those that have made their big bucks may not have reason to stay if they have been using melamine in milk, used sub-standard materials for construction, received bribes, cooked the books, etc.
    Good point, they (the corrupts, the cheaters, the less-than-legal-overnight-millionaires) go where they feel home.

    Mr. G.W.B reprensenting the good part of the world once said: If you harbors terrorists, YOU ARE TERRORISTS.
    - I am looking forward to the same perspective.
    Last edited by Red___Sword; 06-24-2011 at 09:39 PM.
    bluewater2012 likes this.

  15. #1500
    AssassinsMace's Avatar
    AssassinsMace is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,668

    Re: Chinese Economics Thread

    China blurs A380 order, backs 747 amid EU row

    By Tim Hepher Fri Jun 24, 2:20 pm ET

    .

    LE BOURGET, France (Reuters) – China downgraded the announcement of an Airbus superjumbo order and signed up for the Boeing 747-8 as deals worth $9 billion coincided with a row over European emissions trading rules, industry sources said.

    The deals both involved parts of the HNA airlines group and had been planned before the Paris Air Show, they said, but the decision not to announce the names of the buyers triggered one of the mysteries of this week's event.

    Industry sources said plans to announce a high-profile $3.8 billion deal between Airbus and Hong Kong Airlines for 10 A380 superjumbos were called off on Thursday because of China's anger over European plans to charge airlines for emissions.

    China threatened last month to hold back on purchasing Airbus aircraft because of the EU emissions trading scheme, which airlines body IATA has called illegal.

    Additionally, industry sources said a company affiliated to the same carrier, Hainan Airlines, was behind the unexpected announcement of an anonymous deal at Boeing this week.

    Boeing said an unidentified airline had provisionally committed to 15 747-8 passenger jets worth $4.8 billion.

    Airlines often choose to buy jetliners without identifying themselves to their competition, but such announcements are rarely made at air shows which are designed for publicity. Boeing also rarely announces deals before they are confirmed.

    Airbus (EAD.PA) and Boeing (BA.N) declined to comment and representatives of the HNA Group were not available.

    Hong Kong Airlines is 46 percent owned by HNA Group, the parent of Hainan Airlines Co Ltd (600221.SS).

    TEMPTING TARGET

    Airbus and Boeing both brought their largest passenger jets to the show, a biennial event which rotates with the Farnborough Air Show in Britain.

    The 747-8 with 467 seats is Boeing's first stretched version of the 747 and is in the midst of flight testing. It will enter service initially as a freighter, then in a passenger version.

    The 525-seat A380 is the world's largest airliner and Europe's most high-profile aircraft since Concorde, making it a tempting target in any political tensions affecting aerospace.

    The Airbus deal has not itself been blocked and is in the manufacturer's order book, but the decision to cancel a signing ceremony is a clear protest signal, the industry sources said.

    Aircraft purchases also need Chinese government approval.

    The 747-8 purchase followed competition between Airbus and Boeing for the Hong Kong Airlines order.

    While advancing development of its own smaller airplane, China tends to balance orders between the two foreign suppliers.

    From Jan 1 next year, the EU will require all airlines flying to Europe to be included in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), a system that compels polluters to buy permits for each tonne of carbon dioxide they emit above a certain cap.

    China's top aviation industry body ramped up pressure on the European Union earlier this month, saying it would give full support to legal action against the forced entry of airlines into the EU's carbon trading scheme. [ID:nL3E7H60D5]

    China says the scheme is unfair for developing countries and costly.

    (Additional reporting by Matthias Blamont; Editing by Jon Loades-Carter)





    Copyright © 2011 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13