<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>China Defence Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/</link>
		<description>Defense Board for military aviation, army, navy and arms acquisition of the chinese armed forces as well as strategic economic and business policies and goals of china to facilitate its military advancements.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:44:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>new 60 ton tank for the PLA</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/new-60-ton-tank-pla-4922.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#33258;&#34892;&#30740;&#21046;&#30340;99&#24335;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#34429;&#28982;&#26159;&#30446;&#21069;&#19990;&#30028;&#19978;&#36739;&#20026;&#20808;&#36827;&#30340;&#20027;&#25112;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#23545;&#20110;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#26469;&#35828;&#20381;&#26087;&#23384;&#22312;&#19968;&#20123;&#19981;&#28385;&#36275;&#30340;&#32570;&#38519;&#65292;&#22240;&#27492;&#30446;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#20107;&#31185;&#25216;&#26426;&#26500;&#65292;&#23545;&#27492;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#36827;&#34892;&#20102;&#25913;&#36827;&#12290; 
 
&#25913;&#36827;&#22411;&#21495;&#31216;&#20026;&#65306;99&#25913;&#22411;&#12290;&#23545;&#22806;&#20986;&#21475;&#24418;&#24335;&#31216;&#65306;99B&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#12290;&#36825;&#31181;&#22374;&#20811;&#26159;&#19968;&#31181;&#23433;&#35013;&#26377;1&#38376;&#20013;&#22269;&#20135;140mm&#28369;&#33179;&#28846;&#30340;&#20027;&#25112;&#22374;&#20811;&#12290;&#36825;&#31181;&#20027;&#28846;&#20063;&#26159;&#21516;&#26102;&#37319;&#29992;&#20102;&#33258;&#21160;&#25196;&#24377;&#26426;&#31995;&#32479;&#12290;&#20027;&#28846;&#30340;&#31359;&#30002;&#33021;&#21147;&#21313;&#20998;&#24778;&#20154;&#12290;&#28846;&#21475;&#21160;&#33021;&#33021;&#21147;&#36798;&#21040;&#20102;22&#20806;&#28966;&#65292;&#26159;M1A2&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;120mm&#30340;11&#20806;&#28966;&#30340;2&#20493;&#12290;1&#26522;140mm&#20027;&#28846;&#25152;&#21457;&#23556;"&#23614;&#32764;&#31283;&#23450;&#33073;&#22771;&#31359;&#30002;&#24377;"&#21487;&#20197;&#27934;M1A2&#31359;&#21069;&#20027;&#35013;&#30002;&#12290; 
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#33258;&#34892;&#30740;&#21046;&#30340;99&#24335;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#34429;&#28982;&#26159;&#30446;&#21069;&#19990;&#30028;&#19978;&#36739;&#20026;&#20808;&#36827;&#30340;&#20027;&#25112;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#23545;&#20110;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#26469;&#35828;&#20381;&#26087;&#23384;&#22312;&#19968;&#20123;  &#19981;&#28385;&#36275;&#30340;&#32570;&#38519;&#65292;&#22240;&#27492;&#30446;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#20107;&#31185;&#25216;&#26426;&#26500;&#65292;&#23545;&#27492;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#36827;&#34892;&#20102;&#25913;&#36827;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#25913;&#36827;&#22411;&#21495;&#31216;&#20026;&#65306;99&#25913;&#22411;&#12290;&#23545;&#22806;&#20986;&#21475;&#24418;&#24335;&#31216;&#65306;99B&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#12290;&#36825;&#31181;&#22374;&#20811;&#26159;&#19968;&#31181;&#23433;&#35013;&#26377;1&#38376;&#20013;&#22269;&#20135;140mm&#28369;&#33179;&#28846;  &#30340;&#20027;&#25112;&#22374;&#20811;&#12290;&#36825;&#31181;&#20027;&#28846;&#20063;&#26159;&#21516;&#26102;&#37319;&#29992;&#20102;&#33258;&#21160;&#25196;&#24377;&#26426;&#31995;&#32479;&#12290;&#20027;&#28846;&#30340;&#31359;&#30002;&#33021;&#21147;&#21313;&#20998;&#24778;&#20154;&#12290;&#28846;&#21475;&#21160;&#33021;&#33021;&#21147;&#36798;&#21040;&#20102;22&#20806;&#28966;  &#65292;&#26159;M1A2&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;120mm&#30340;11&#20806;&#28966;&#30340;2&#20493;&#12290;1&#26522;140mm&#20027;&#28846;&#25152;&#21457;&#23556;&quot;&#23614;&#32764;&#31283;&#23450;&#33073;&#22771;&#31359;&#30002;&#24377;&quot;&#21487;&#20197;&#27934;M  1A2&#31359;&#21069;&#20027;&#35013;&#30002;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#32780;&#33258;&#21160;&#25805;&#30596;&#26426;&#26500;&#20063;&#36827;&#34892;&#30456;&#20851;&#25913;&#36827;&#65292;&#38543;&#21518;&#21448;&#23545;&#20182;&#30340;&#25112;&#22330;&#29615;&#22659;&#20027;&#21160;&#20316;&#25112;&#31995;&#32479;&#65292;&#36827;&#34892;&#20102;&#25913;&#21892;&#12290;&#21152;&#22823;&#20102;&#28608;&#20809;&#30505;&#30446;&#31995;&#32479;&#30340;&#20316;&#25112;  &#36317;&#31163;&#19982;&#33021;&#37327;&#36755;&#20986;&#30340;&#33021;&#21147;&#12290;&#25913;&#36827;&#20102;&#24494;&#20809;&#22812;&#35270;&#31995;&#32479;&#12290;&#22686;&#21152;&#20102;&#33267;&#23569;200&#31859;&#30340;&#27979;&#36317;&#19982;&#21457;&#29616;&#36317;&#31163;&#65292;&#36825;&#20351;&#24471;99&#25913;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#24050;  &#32463;&#21487;&#20197;&#25104;&#20026;&#23545;&#25239;&#35199;&#26041;&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;&#39318;&#35201;&#27494;&#22120;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#32780;&#22312;&#35013;&#30002;&#26041;&#38754;&#65292;&#20026;&#20102;&#24357;&#34917;&#21069;T72&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#24213;&#30424;&#37096;&#20301;&#30340;&#35832;&#22810;&#19981;&#36275;&#65292;&#21152;&#22823;&#20102;&#21069;&#20027;&#35013;&#30002;&#19982;&#28846;&#22612;&#35013;&#30002;&#30340;&#21160;&#24577;&#21402;&#24230;&#12290;&#22312;&#24213;&#30424;&#19979;  &#37096;&#65292;&#22686;&#21152;&#20102;&#25239;&#20987;&#21453;&#22374;&#20811;&#22320;&#38647;&#30340;&#27934;&#31359;&#33021;&#21147;&#12290;&#30446;&#21069;&#20182;&#30340;&#21069;&#20027;&#35013;&#30002;&#24050;&#32463;&#23436;&#20840;&#21487;&#20197;&#36229;&#36234;M1A2&#30340;1080mm&#12290;&#22312;&#20182;&#30340;&#21160;  &#21147;&#31995;&#32479;&#26041;&#38754;&#65292;&#20013;&#22269;&#20063;&#20570;&#20102;&#24456;&#22823;&#30340;&#21152;&#24378;&#12290;&#25442;&#35013;&#20102;&#22823;&#21151;&#29575;&#21457;&#21160;&#26426;&#65292;&#21487;&#20197;&#36798;&#21040;1500 &#21305;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#20013;&#22269;&#22312;&#26089;&#26399;&#23601;&#24320;&#22987;&#31192;&#23494;&#30740;&#21046;&#36229;&#22823;&#21475;&#24452;&#22374;&#20811;&#28846;&#12290;&#36825;&#24050;&#32463;&#19981;&#26159;&#26032;&#38395;&#30340;&#26032;&#38395;&#20102;&#65292;&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#22312;&#37027;&#20010;&#26102;&#26399;&#65292;&#20013;&#22269;&#31934;&#23494;&#38050;&#26448;&#38203;&#36896;&#25216;  &#26415;&#65292;&#36319;&#19981;&#33021;&#28385;&#36275;140mm&#22374;&#20811;&#28846;&#25152;&#38656;&#35201;&#30340;&#28846;&#31649;&#30005;&#35299;&#28195;&#30340;&#31243;&#24230;&#65292;&#22240;&#27492;&#65292;&#22312;&#22810;&#27425;&#35797;&#39564;&#20013;&#20013;&#22269;&#20986;&#29616;&#20102;2&#65293;3&#27425;&quot;&#28856;&#33179;&quot;  &#30340;&#20005;&#37325;&#22833;&#35823;&#12290;&#32780;&#19988;&#26366;&#32463;&#19968;&#24230;&#23548;&#33268;&#20013;&#22269;&#22823;&#21475;&#24452;&#22374;&#20811;&#28846;&#30740;&#21046;&#32456;&#27490;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#38543;&#30528;&#20013;&#22269;&#33719;&#24471;&#20102;&#26469;&#33258;&#28023;&#22806;&#30340;&#38203;&#36896;&#31934;&#23494;&#38050;&#26448;&#30340;&#25972;&#20307;&#38203;&#36896;&#25216;&#26415;&#20197;&#21518;&#65292;&#24773;&#20917;&#24471;&#21040;&#20102;&#25913;&#21892;&#12290;&#32780;&#20013;&#22269;&#30340;&#25152;&#35859;&#30340;&quot;&#28023;&#22806;&quot;  &#20107;&#23454;&#19978;&#26159;3&#21517;&#26469;&#33258;&#24503;&#22269;&#30340;&#20013;&#22269;&#31821;&#22238;&#22269;&#20154;&#21592;&#12290;&#20182;&#20204;&#26159;&#21407;&#26469;&#21407;&#24503;&#22269;&#33713;&#33589;&#38050;&#38081;&#20844;&#21496;&#30340;&#38599;&#21592;&#12290;&#20182;&#20204;&#22312;&#37027;&#37324;&#36127;&#36131;&#30005;&#35299;&#38050;&#30340;&#38203;&#36896;  &#19982;&#30740;&#21046;&#12290;&#22312;&#36825;&#26679;&#30340;&#20154;&#21592;&#21327;&#21161;&#19979;&#65292;&#20013;&#22269;&#30340;&#36229;&#21475;&#24452;&#28779;&#28846;&#30740;&#21046;&#24037;&#20316;&#65292;&#32456;&#20110;&#22312;06&#24180;&#25104;&#21151;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#30446;&#21069;99&#24335;&#25913;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;&#33258;&#37325;&#30001;&#20110;&#25913;&#35013;&#20102;&#22823;&#25209;&#35013;&#22791;&#65292;&#32780;&#19988;&#25442;&#35013;&#20102;&#22823;&#21475;&#24452;&#28779;&#28846;&#65292;&#21152;&#20043;&#24341;&#36827;&#20102;&#26032;&#22411;&#21160;&#21147;&#19982;&#26032;&#22411;&#25196;&#24377;  &#26426;&#30340;&#25514;&#26045;&#65292;&#23548;&#33268;&#20102;&#36825;&#31181;&#22374;&#20811;&#33258;&#37325;&#20005;&#37325;&#25856;&#21319;&#12290;&#30446;&#21069;&#24050;&#32463;&#36798;&#21040;&#20102;60&#21544;&#32423;&#12290;&#36825;&#31181;&#37325;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#38754;&#23545;&#20013;&#22269;&#21335;&#26041;&#30340;&#27700;&#32593;&#22823;&#38470;&#65292;&#26159;  &#38590;&#20197;&#25215;&#21463;&#36825;&#26679;&#30340;&#37325;&#37327;&#12290;&#20294;&#26159;&#65292;&#30446;&#21069;&#30340;&#21335;&#26041;&#37096;&#32626;&#22320;&#21306;&#65292;&#20063;&#26159;&#20013;&#22269;&#37096;&#32626;99&#24335;&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;&#20027;&#35201;&#22320;&#21306;&#12290;&#38754;&#23545;&#21488;&#28286;&#23616;&#21183;&#65292;&#20013;&#22269;&#37096;  &#32626;&#26032;&#22411;&#22374;&#20811;&#26159;&#24517;&#39035;&#30340;&#36873;&#25321;&#12290;<br />
<br />
&#38754;&#23545;&#22914;&#27492;&#23616;&#38754;&#65292;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#26159;&#19981;&#26159;&#22312;&#21487;&#33021;&#22823;&#35268;&#27169;&#21435;&#25913;&#36827;&#30446;&#21069;&#24050;&#32463;&#37096;&#32626;&#30340;700&#36742;99&#24335;&#22374;&#20811;&#12290;&#20197;&#21450;&#32487;&#32493;&#29983;&#20135;&#22823;&#32422;21  00&#36742;99&#25913;&#24335;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#22914;&#26524;&#36825;&#26679;&#20013;&#22269;&#20891;&#26041;&#24517;&#39035;&#21516;&#26102;&#29983;&#20135;&#20004;&#31181;&#20027;&#25112;&#22374;&#20811;&#65292;&#20854;&#20013;99&#24335;&#29992;&#20110;&#37096;&#32626;&#22312;&#20013;&#22269;&#21335;&#26041;&#12290;&#32780;99&#25913;  &#21017;&#21487;&#20197;&#29992;&#20110;&#37096;&#32626;&#22312;&#20013;&#22269;&#21271;&#26041;&#37096;&#20998;&#22478;&#24066;&#12290;&#20294;&#26159;&#22810;&#20197;&#22823;&#22411;&#22478;&#24066;&#20026;&#20027;&#12290;&#22240;&#20026;&#36825;&#37324;&#19968;&#20123;&#26725;&#26753;&#21487;&#20197;&#25903;&#25745;&#36825;&#31181;&quot;&#36229;&#37325;&quot;&#22374;&#20811;&#30340;&#33021;  &#21147;&#12290;</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/">Army</category>
			<dc:creator>challenge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/new-60-ton-tank-pla-4922.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Type 96G FCS?</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/type-96g-fcs-4921.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[With the G update, it seems possible that the gunners sight the Type 96 has 
been fitted with a thermal viewer. 
 
  But, I was curious as to whether there has been speculation about the vision equipment used by the commander? I mean, what looks like a sight is attached to the cupola, though I'm...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>With the G update, it seems possible that the gunners sight the Type 96 has<br />
been fitted with a thermal viewer.<br />
<br />
  But, I was curious as to whether there has been speculation about the vision equipment used by the commander? I mean, what looks like a sight is attached to the cupola, though I'm not sure if it can rotate or not. Also appears smaller than those on on the Type 99 &amp; MBT 2000, so it may just be a periscope. Could be wrong?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/">Army</category>
			<dc:creator>Temujin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/army/type-96g-fcs-4921.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iranian fifth generation fighter</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/iranian-fifth-generation-fighter-4920.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
An Iranian air force commander said Sunday that Iran has successfully tested the prototype of its first domestically-built stealth fighter, the English-language satellite Press TV reported. 
 
"The plane, due to its physical attributes and the material used in its body, cannot be...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				An Iranian air force commander said Sunday that Iran has successfully tested the prototype of its first domestically-built stealth fighter, the English-language satellite Press TV reported.<br />
<br />
&quot;The plane, due to its physical attributes and the material used in its body, cannot be detected by any radar,&quot; Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh, the force's coordination deputy, was quoted as saying.<br />
<br />
Nasirzadeh said data from the test flight was favorable and the air force will move forward with its plans to produce the plane called Sofreh Mahi, which means Manta Ray, the report said.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Source: <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-02/08/c_13167310.htm" target="_blank">Xinhua</a><br />
<br />
No one should hold their breath waiting for pictures.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/">World Armed Forces</category>
			<dc:creator>Vlad Plasmius</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/iranian-fifth-generation-fighter-4920.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The C-PGS threat to China</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/c-pgs-threat-china-4919.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The Conventional - Prompt Global Strike system may include hypersonic aircraft, future bombers (unmanned possibly), or just ICBM's with conventional warheads.  
 
The recent ATOL article about the C-PGS puts up a number of challenges for China's security, if the US does decide to pursue the system....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Conventional - Prompt Global Strike system may include hypersonic aircraft, future bombers (unmanned possibly), or just ICBM's with conventional warheads. <br />
<br />
The recent ATOL article about the C-PGS puts up a number of challenges for China's security, if the US does decide to pursue the system. (But how do they have the cash??)<br />
<a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/LB04Ad01.html" target="_blank">Asia Times Online :: China News, China Business News, Taiwan and Hong Kong News and Business.</a><br />
<br />
There's the thread about whether C-PGS could replace carriers, but my question is how would a &quot;US force capable of striking intercontinental targets with conventional weapons in less than an hour&quot; would influence China, and how may China try to counter the system?<br />
<br />
A C-PGS could potentially threaten China's nuclear arsenal - meaning china will either have to renounce the &quot;no first use&quot; policy they've upheld since they tested their first A-bomb, or they'll have to develop a variety of systems to improve their nukes' survivability. This could range from making them more mobile, to NMD, and perhaps even space based assets. The Rick Fisher article a while back said China could be pursuing orbital bombers and satellite lasers - with the C-PGS announcement imho those suggestions seem far more likely.<br />
<br />
The C-PGS could also threaten China's airfields, bases, Command and Control stations... It's a huge game changer, and if fielded imho it'll be a bigger agent of change than the ASBM is/would be. I hope the PLA will be taking the threat seriously, and develop more counter systems and perhaps even their own C-PGS. <br />
<br />
So... err...let's discuss; <br />
a) what measures China could use to counter the c-pgs <br />
b) the technical feasibility of China creating it's own c-pgs<br />
b) the impact the c-pgs will have on China's military <br />
d) anything else any one can think of<br />
<br />
Considering China's current technological state, will they be able to make... say their DF-31A's have a CEP accurate enough to hit a house after intercontinental flight? If they're able to make an ASBM hit a moving carrier (assuming they've already got the ASBM relatively operational), then I think a task such as this wouldn't be impossible.<br />
Other systems, like hypersonic ucav's and bombers, orbital bombers, which could be part of a Chinese C-PGS I think should be discounted, since we've not really seen any evidence of any Chinese development in those areas. I mean have we even heard of a Chinese X-51 or X-43 equivalent?<br />
<br />
Anyway, I hope this thread doesn't get cancelled or merged, I think the subject is important enough to get it's own discussion.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/">Strategic Defense</category>
			<dc:creator>Bltizo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/c-pgs-threat-china-4919.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The End of the Carrier Age?</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/end-carrier-age-4918.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Sometimes you just read something, somewhere and you know that you are being told something important, but that its nots immediately obvious what it is and that it takes a few days or message to strike home. 
 
I think its fair to say that the following from Peter J Brown, published in ATOL falls...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Sometimes you just read something, somewhere and you know that you are being told something important, but that its nots immediately obvious what it is and that it takes a few days or message to strike home.<br />
<br />
I think its fair to say that the following from Peter J Brown, published in ATOL falls into this category.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/LB04Ad01.html" target="_blank">Asia Times Online :: China News, China Business News, Taiwan and Hong Kong News and Business.</a><br />
<br />
Its not so much the discourse of the article itself, which; to be honest, is hardly the most riveting compelling or convincing of reads, but it does leave the nagging feeling of significance and one which bugged me for a while after reading.<br />
<br />
But what was it?<br />
<br />
The Premise is simple enough, build some long range missiles and use them to deliver a massive and crushing deep strike against any other nation on earth in less than an hour. On the face of it, not that remarkable if you wanted to punish another Iraq or Libya perhaps, but the author was specifically speaking about China. Well China is a huge country full of strategic targets, if you wanted to perform an effective C-PGS strike against China, you would need a huge number of missiles and the cost of this on top of the current platforms for long range power projection - The Carrier Strike Group, would be prohibitive....<br />
<br />
.......which of course is when the penny started to drop.<br />
<br />
C_PGS is not about running alongside the Carriers, its all about replacing them.<br />
<br />
The next sensation can only be described as a Clapham Junction moment, where a whole shedload of thoughts start running through your mind pretty much all at once.<br />
<br />
Trying desperately to restore order and make a a bewildering series of circular thoughts in to a logical and serial progression, I finally managed to nail the premise down.<br />
<br />
What this whole thing is about is recognising and realising the moment at which the effective expressions of National Power and Power Projection change fundamentally. Its not a new process.<br />
<br />
In the last one hundred and fifty years, the Battleship has been the Prime Symbol of a Nations Power, during that time, Sail has given way to Steam, Wood to Iron, The Iron Clad to the Super Dreadnought and the Dreadnought in turn given way to the Aircraft Carrier.<br />
<br />
Now not only is the Aircraft Carrier and its Aircraft about to surrender its position, but the Navy itself is losing its Pride of Place to an entirely new set of Aerial/Orbital Weapon Systems. It is the biggest shift in Military affairs since the introduction of Firearms Five hundred Years ago.<br />
<br />
The Strike Carrier has had a good run since the 1950's but the world has changed beyond all recognition since those days, with the development of powerful computers, Global positioning Satellites and High Resolution Imaging for tracking and targeting. All of these things combined with various disciplines of rocket science have resulted in extremely mobile, flexible and fast launching missiles that can land with pin point accuracy at the furthest distances of the Planet or intercept orbital Satellites or even other missiles as they prepare for re-entry. The Strike Carrier, for so long the hunter, has now become the prey.<br />
<br />
This has undoubtedly been accepted in many quarters for a while, but for a country like the US, dispensing of its Carriers has become an almost impossible political act. Too much investment in time, money resources, men and prestige has made the image of the Carrier synonymous with the image of the US itself. This is exactly the same problem as Britain had in the 1930's with the Dreadnoughts, even though it was clear that airpower was now the key and that the Big Battleships were vulnerable to it. The admission was to painful to contemplate and it cost the humiliation of the Prince of Wales and Repulse at the hands of the Japanese to put the matter beyond doubt.<br />
<br />
My personal belief has been for some time that the Strike Carrier is obsolete and that the only role for the Carrier is the more modest one of Organic Fleet Air Protection. It has also been my belief that the CCP shared this view, which is why work on its Carrier project has been undertaken at a modest pace, while much more effort has gone into Strategic Missiles.<br />
China has been lucky that it has joined the party late, without baggage and with a free hand to build modern forces that really reflect the strategic realities of the modern level of technology.<br />
<br />
For China the prioritise have been precision missiles, ASBM, ASAT systems and now Missile Defence, all along side a growing network of positioning and spy satellites. <br />
<br />
America has suddenly realised that it has invested huge sums of money to finance systems which may very well be evolutionary dead ends in military development. Systems like the F22 may be superb examples of the craft, but they are overly expensive and their advantage quickly lost by the widespread introduction of cheaper but only slightly less capable systems. Indeed, what has to date been described in almost condescending tones as China's asymmetrical capability may well soon emerge as fully acknowledged, truly modern tactics.<br />
<br />
I had always supposed that it would have required the US to suffer a Military Disaster involving its Carriers before the point was hit home. I do therefore give the US credit if they have indeed decided to bit the bullet in advance. If so it could be fair to say the current economic condition of the US may well have provided the final level of rationale.<br />
<br />
If this is so, then the US has one tremendous advantage to be able to rapidly build this new capability and to be able to do so on the cheap: its vast stockpile of ICBMs and other nuclear delivery missile systems. The drive for nuclear weapons reductions can indeed release significant resources no longer needed to safely contain fissionable weaponised material.<br />
<br />
In addition, a stockpile of conventional missiles only requires a fraction of the cost and manpower to operate than it needs to operate a dozen Carrier Strike Groups.<br />
<br />
So, has America suddenly decided to play the game the Chinese way?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/">Strategic Defense</category>
			<dc:creator>SampanViking</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/end-carrier-age-4918.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Valentine's Day vs Chinese New Year]]></title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/valentines-day-vs-chinese-new-year-4917.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As many of you might know, this year, Chinese New Year falls on Valentine's Day. For those of you who celebrate the Chinese New Year, and who has a significant other, how do you plan on celebrating this dual holiday? Will you be spending time with your family, or try to have some kind of romantic...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As many of you might know, this year, Chinese New Year falls on Valentine's Day. For those of you who celebrate the Chinese New Year, and who has a significant other, how do you plan on celebrating this dual holiday? Will you be spending time with your family, or try to have some kind of romantic event with your SO?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/"><![CDATA[Members' Club Room]]></category>
			<dc:creator>solarz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/valentines-day-vs-chinese-new-year-4917.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>China continue to market F-8T</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/air-force/china-continue-market-f-8t-4916.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[last year aerospace exhibition in Beijing, Shenyang aircraft to market newer version of F-8,the F-8T,the "t" variant powered by WP-14,which give the aircraft bigger thrust than original WP-13,improving her T:W ratio, also the aircraft can fire guided air to air and air to ground missile. 
the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>last year aerospace exhibition in Beijing, Shenyang aircraft to market newer version of F-8,the F-8T,the &quot;t&quot; variant powered by WP-14,which give the aircraft bigger thrust than original WP-13,improving her T:W ratio, also the aircraft can fire guided air to air and air to ground missile.<br />
the aircraft was offer to pakistan,but was rejected by PAF citing the outdated airframe design.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/air-force/">Air Force</category>
			<dc:creator>challenge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/air-force/china-continue-market-f-8t-4916.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Grand Pubah Speaks!!</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/grand-pubah-speaks-4915.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am the Grand Pubah.. 
 
Image: http://i47.tinypic.com/2d2c7k7.jpg  
 
 
---Quote--- 
The Grand Pubah was the head of the Water Buffalo Lodge on the old US  cartoon TV series the Flintstones. 
---End Quote--- 
Members.. I have been thinking about open a thread so I can establish a dialog between...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am the Grand Pubah..<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i47.tinypic.com/2d2c7k7.jpg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				The Grand Pubah was the head of the Water Buffalo Lodge on the old US  cartoon TV series the Flintstones.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Members.. I have been thinking about open a thread so I can establish a dialog between myself and the membership of this forum.<br />
<br />
First off I'd like to remind everyone to re-read the rules of this forum.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/announcements/forum-rules-things-remember-before-posting-important-please-read-20.html" target="_blank">FORUM RULES: Things to Remember Before Posting,  important, please read!</a><br />
<br />
What this thread will be about is reminders of the rules and the way this forum conducts it's discussions. <br />
<br />
<b>DO NOT </b> in this thread post/report about any other members misbehavior. Just simply send me a PM..not a visitor message but a PM.<br />
<br />
Recently I banned a couple of new members because they were trolls. Pure and simple. We cannot allow that sort of behavior. Why? Read through the old threads and you shall see why..These represent the sort of discussion we shall not allow.<br />
<br />
These threads were started by a member from Finland named Jones Henry. He claimed to be an African immigrant to Finland. Enjoy!!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/i-support-taiwanese-independence-458.html" target="_blank">I support Taiwanese independence</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/how-defeat-us-471.html" target="_blank">How to defeat the US?</a><br />
<br />
	  	  		 		 			 			 			 			 			 			 			<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/military-coup-us-502.html" target="_blank">A military coup in the US?</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/end-american-empire-513.html" target="_blank">The end of the American &quot;empire&quot;</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/just-thought-667.html" target="_blank">Just a thought</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/"><![CDATA[Members' Club Room]]></category>
			<dc:creator>bd popeye</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/members-club-room/grand-pubah-speaks-4915.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>some answer to somebody 2</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/some-answer-somebody-2-a-4913.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[maozedong qinshihuang? 
 
how shame were they if they met Nurhaci Dorgon Kangxi or Cixi in hell? 
 
give out your statistical analysis please? 
 
mods note >>>He's a troll! 
 
Image: http://i49.tinypic.com/spvql0.jpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>maozedong qinshihuang?<br />
<br />
how shame were they if they met Nurhaci Dorgon Kangxi or Cixi in hell?<br />
<br />
give out your statistical analysis please?<br />
<br />
<font color="Red">mods note &gt;&gt;&gt;He's a troll!</font><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i49.tinypic.com/spvql0.jpg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/">Military History</category>
			<dc:creator>yuyueyuximing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/some-answer-somebody-2-a-4913.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>some answer to somebody</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/some-answer-somebody-4912.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[although i know it is useless to answer that,i write this post,and it will be the last one 
 
the generals in "ping san fan" 
 
&#21202;&#23572;&#38182;&#12289;&#24432;&#27888;&#12289;&#23731;&#20048; &#36213;&#33391;&#26635;&#12289;&#29579;&#36827;&#23460;&#12289;&#34081;&#27603;&#33635;&#12289;&#33891;&#21355;&#22269; 
 
u can find manchu here 
 
u can find han here too,but let us notice who they are&#12288;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>although i know it is useless to answer that,i write this post,and it will be the last one<br />
<br />
the generals in &quot;ping san fan&quot;<br />
<br />
&#21202;&#23572;&#38182;&#12289;&#24432;&#27888;&#12289;&#23731;&#20048; &#36213;&#33391;&#26635;&#12289;&#29579;&#36827;&#23460;&#12289;&#34081;&#27603;&#33635;&#12289;&#33891;&#21355;&#22269;<br />
<br />
u can find manchu here<br />
<br />
u can find han here too,but let us notice who they are&#12288;<br />
<br />
they are —— the &quot;your slave&quot;<br />
<br />
from which time the slaveholder can shift his evil to the slave?<br />
<br />
and this will be my last post</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/">Military History</category>
			<dc:creator>yuyueyuximing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/some-answer-somebody-4912.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thunder Run and Battle for Grozny</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/thunder-run-battle-grozny-4911.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In the taking of Baghdad in 2003, two armored battalions and an infantry battalion conducted two operations that effectively ended Iraqi resistance in Baghdad. These two operations - Thunder Runs, consisted of armored columns driving straight through the South western corner of Baghdad, were...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In the taking of Baghdad in 2003, two armored battalions and an infantry battalion conducted two operations that effectively ended Iraqi resistance in Baghdad. These two operations - Thunder Runs, consisted of armored columns driving straight through the South western corner of Baghdad, were immensely successful. The first Thunder Run linked up US troops at the Airport with troops south of the city. The second Thunder run captured Saddam's Palace and held it overnight, effectively holding off any Iraqi counterattacks and crushed resistance in the city.<br />
<br />
In the First Battle of Grozny in the First Chechen War, the Russians initially planned for four armoured columns to be thrust into central Grozny, capture the Presidential Palace, and seize the city. This goal was somewhat similar to the US objective in the second Thunder Run, to capture and hold Saddam's Palace. However, Russian forces were bogged down and slowly annihilated inside the city as Chechen forces and its RPG teams deployed to ambush the Russian armour. In the end, when the Russians came back to Grozny, they had to fight a Stalingrad-style house by house battle to win Grozny.<br />
<br />
In both operations, the attacker enjoyed total firepower superiority and air superiority. In both operations, the attacker carried out a bold plan of armoured thrusts through the hostile city. What exactly caused such staggering difference in results? Was it the broad streets and low-rise buildings of Baghdad that favoured armour more than Grozny? Was it the tactics used by the Iraqis versus the Chechens?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/">World Armed Forces</category>
			<dc:creator>Obcession</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/world-armed-forces/thunder-run-battle-grozny-4911.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>let chinese talk about the gunpowder weapon in ancient age</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/let-chinese-talk-about-gunpowder-weapon-ancient-age-4910.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[i am a han (we chinese call ourselves "han") 
 
i have not been to other country ,so my english may be very poor,sorry 
 
i find that many of u are interested in ancient gunpowder weapons in china 
 
so i want to say someting 
 
we han invented gunpowder weapon twice times ,because the civilaztion...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>i am a han (we chinese call ourselves &quot;han&quot;)<br />
<br />
i have not been to other country ,so my english may be very poor,sorry<br />
<br />
i find that many of u are interested in ancient gunpowder weapons in china<br />
<br />
so i want to say someting<br />
<br />
we han invented gunpowder weapon twice times ,because the civilaztion is distoried for several times by barbarians(the recent Destruction is known as the manchu barbarians conquest)<br />
<br />
the first time,we use gunpowder weapon is in Cao Wei(one kingdom of the famous three kingdoms)<br />
<br />
the weapon is &quot;fire launch stones&quot;(&#28779;&#23556;&#36830;&#30707;)&#65294;<br />
<br />
maybe that is the &quot;fire rockets&quot; u talked about,beacause someone also call it &quot;fire arrow&quot;(&quot;fire rockers&quot; equal to &quot;fire arrow&quot; in modern chinese ,but the word should be translated as &quot;fire arrow&quot; in this period).<br />
<br />
&quot;&#38472;&#20179;&#65306;&#39759;&#26126;&#24093;&#36963;&#23558;&#20891;&#22826;&#21407;&#37085;&#26157;&#31569;&#12290;&#38472;&#20179;&#22478;&#25104;&#65292;&#35832;&#33883;&#20142;&#22260;&#20043;……&#20142;&#20197;&#25968;&#19975;&#20154;&#25915;&#26157;&#21315;&#20313;&#20154;&#65292;&#20197;&#20113;&#26799;&#20914;&#36710;&#22320;&#36947;&#36924;&#23556;&#26157;&#65292;  &#26157;&#20197;&#28779;&#23556;&#36830;&#30707;&#25298;&#20043;&#65292;&#20142;&#19981;&#21033;&#32780;&#36824;&#12290;&quot;<br />
——&#12298;&#27700;&#32463;&#27880;&#12299;<br />
<br />
&#20142;……&#36215;&#20113;&#26799;&#20914;&#36710;&#31561;&#20197;&#20020;&#22478;&#65292;&#26157;&#20110;&#26159;&#20197;&#28779;&#31661;&#36870;&#23556;&#20113;&#26799;&#65292;&#26799;&#28982;&#65292;&#26799;&#19978;&#20154;&#30342;&#28903;&#27515;&#12290;&quot;<br />
——&#12298;&#39759;&#30053;&#12299;<br />
<br />
the weapon contributed to a Victory of Cao Wei<br />
<br />
in this battle Cao Wei equipped with &quot;fire launch stones&quot; defeat Shu Han equipped with the famous chu-ko-nu(belived be invented by zhuge-kongming.by the way ,chu-ko-nu is mainly used as large equipment on battleships or city danfence equipment than singleuseweapon.<br />
<br />
<br />
but i have to say the &quot;fire launch stones&quot; may probably be a city defense weapon instead of a field weapon.<br />
<br />
and no evidence prove that many of Cao Wei army is equipped with &quot;fire launch stones&quot;<br />
<br />
after three kingdoms age,our Civilization is destoried by barbarians(known as the &quot;five barbarians age&quot;)<br />
<br />
so we have to invent gunpowder weapon for another time<br />
<br />
the mature gunpowder singleuseweapon is invented in Song Dynasty<br />
<br />
i will be glade if the article helps</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/">Military History</category>
			<dc:creator>yuyueyuximing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/military-history/let-chinese-talk-about-gunpowder-weapon-ancient-age-4910.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[China's Best Weapon against the US is the the Chinese Government Procurement  Program]]></title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/chinas-best-weapon-against-us-chinese-government-procurement-program-4908.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[No, it's not the nuke weapons 
No, it's not the new ships and submarines 
 
No, it's not the ASBM 
 
No, it's not the Missile interception Tech.. 
 
It has nothing to do with military... 
Well, what is it then?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>No, it's not the nuke weapons<br />
No, it's not the new ships and submarines<br />
<br />
No, it's not the ASBM<br />
<br />
No, it's not the Missile interception Tech..<br />
<br />
It has nothing to do with military...<br />
Well, what is it then?    <br />
<br />
....<br />
<br />
The answer is China's new program that curtail US firms under the Chinese Government Procurement Program.<br />
<br />
It's call the &quot;Indigenous Accreditation Program&quot; Which is a new program by the Chinese government spells out that all Government level Procurement should go for products that has Chinese company IP..  Meaning Foreign firms that control the technology selling to the Chinese government will not work. <br />
In order for foreign firms to qualify, it has to form JV with Chinese firms and apply for new set IP under CHinese laws in CHina.<br />
<br />
Well, you think why don't US firms and other firms challenge CHina's new program in WTO.  It can't because CHinese government purchasing never part of WTO,  China knew it at the beginning, and withheld that when signed for WTO.  Only the regular Consumer market be part of WTO, not the Government Procurement.    They were pretty shrewd...<br />
<br />
In all fairness, US has &quot;buy Amercian &quot; clause in its government stimulus program...<br />
<br />
Anyway, US firms are jumping up and down over this, that Chinese Government Procuremnt Program is well over $ 87 Billion <b>big pie</b>. <br />
<br />
First, all the foreign firms gathered up in CHina together wrote letters to Chinese government , complaining about the they were boxed out. but to no avail Chinese government ignored them..<br />
<br />
US chamber of Commerce President in China Donahue said, &quot;we going to raise hell on this issue&quot;<br />
<br />
Then The US firmed wrote letters to Obama admin and Obama was deeply disturbed by this.. Clinton and Locke spoke out against this...<br />
<br />
Well, US knows the option is limited because this has no WTO backing...<br />
Otherwise, US would take China over this quickly just like the Rare Mineral Export..<br />
<br />
Some folks would say US would set up protectionist measures against Chinese goods to US.<br />
<br />
But keep mind Most Chinese goods going to US are just normal consumer goods, rather low end..<br />
<br />
CHinese Indeginous Program is set up to foster the high tech capiblity of Chinese Companies .  US firms are fear once the Chinese high tech firms dominate the chinese market , then that would be Bad news..   Kind of like what huawei was doing...  If Chinese hightech firms dominate in CHina then they can go outward after that... On top of that, that huge Governemtn Procurement Pie they are missing.<br />
<br />
I have keep track of related news quite a bit.....<br />
<br />
By far this has create the deepest disturbances in the US circle.<br />
US react to this far more than anything I have seen..   If CHina set up some tariffs against importing US products like cars, like agriculture ,  US doesn't care.. No big deal..<br />
<br />
But CHinese government fostering Domestic high tech firms in CHina has strike deep fear for US..<br />
<br />
And the Chinese Government Procurement  program , not under the binding of WTO, has became a weapon against the interests of the US.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/">Strategic Defense</category>
			<dc:creator>lilzz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/chinas-best-weapon-against-us-chinese-government-procurement-program-4908.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Great Wall of China is digital</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/new-great-wall-china-digital-4901.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:56:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>New Great Wall of China is digital 
Minnie Chan  
Jan 30, 2010	 
       
 
 
---Quote--- 
China has completed an ambitious drive to install digital surveillance systems at all border checkpoints, on land and offshore, with the new Great Wall being seen as a key part of its national security...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font size="5">New Great Wall of China is digital</font><br />
Minnie Chan <br />
Jan 30, 2010	<br />
      <br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				China has completed an ambitious drive to install digital surveillance systems at all border checkpoints, on land and offshore, with the new Great Wall being seen as a key part of its national security strategy.<br />
The People's Liberation Army Daily said the surveillance system had been completed at the end of last year, with thousands of video surveillance devices installed and connected to dozens of control centres by fibre-optic cables.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
It said the final border post to have the system installed was in the Tibet border county of Medog. All border checkpoints with more than 100 soldiers were now linked.<br />
<br />
The newspaper said the digital surveillance system was part of a 4.7 billion yuan (HK$5.3 billion) infrastructure project begun in 1994 after China signed border agreements with 12 of the 14 countries with which it shares a land frontier (India and Bhutan were the exceptions).<br />
<br />
The offshore border project began in 2004 after a dispute with Russia over Heixiazi Island - which Russia calls Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island - was solved. Russia formally handed over half of Heixiazi to China four years later, ending a decades-long border dispute between the two countries.<br />
<br />
The newspaper said the PLA had finished 25,000 kilometres of patrol paths along its sea border, more than 7,000 kilometres of border fences on land, at least 3,000 border markers and watchtowers, coastal defence installations, piers and helipads.<br />
<br />
The PLA Daily said the digitisation of the border surveillance system would help the army curb the &quot;three forces&quot; of separatism, terrorism and extremism in China. It said the system would also help control smuggling, illegal immigration, drug trafficking and other crimes.<br />
<br />
Beijing-based retired PLA general Xu Guangyu said the video surveillance system installed at border sites was built to military specifications, featuring high-definition images and all-weather functions.<br />
<br />
&quot;In fact, our system has also been perfected day after day: for example, we can connect it to surveillance satellites which we have launched into space,&quot; Xu said. &quot;In future, it will be further upgraded by introducing unmanned aircraft in some remote border posts or those with bad weather.&quot;<br />
<br />
A retired PLA senior colonel who requested anonymity said the frontier surveillance network was not a result of concerns following riots in Tibet and Xinjiang in the past two years. Rather it reflected the concerns of former PLA leaders who had visited frontier posts in Tibet, Xinjiang and some plateau regions, many in harsh, uninhabited areas.<br />
<br />
&quot;Many PLA leaders, like former general staff head Fu Quanyou, have never stopped lobbying the central government to set up a human-oriented border infrastructure system, to improve the working environment for our frontier troops since the 1960s,&quot; the senior colonel, who visited Medog in 1988, said.<br />
<br />
&quot;The computerisation of the frontier patrol system was launched two decades ago as our economy improved after opening up.&quot;<br />
<br />
He said the computerisation of the surveillance system at remote frontier guard posts was welcome news to soldiers who served in them, because it would make it easier for them to do their job.<br />
<br />
&quot;The video surveillance devices not only enhance border security but provide a human-oriented working environment for our frontier solders,&quot; he said. &quot;Many of our soldiers working in remote and oxygen-deficient plateaus have been suffering from blood and heart problems.&quot;<br />
<br />
The PLA Daily said the frontier surveillance project had focused on sea defence in recent years, with the Spratly and Paracel Islands in the South China Sea being key targets.<br />
<br />
Victor Sit Fung-shuen, a professor of geopolitics and director of Hong Kong Baptist University's Advanced Institute for Contemporary China Studies, said improved border defences on the disputed islands would have an impact on China's neighbours given their overlapping territorial claims. &quot;But I think it will be a positive impact in the long term because we have to solve the disputes actively one day,&quot; he said. &quot;China can only concentrate on economic and trade development when it solves all border disputes on land and sea.&quot;
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.scmp.com/portal/site/SCMP/menuitem.2af62ecb329d3d7733492d9253a0a0a0/?vgnextoid=c7ce3790dba76210VgnVCM100000360a0a0aRCRD&amp;ss=China&amp;s=News" target="_blank">China News Headlines | Hong Kong's premier newspaper online | SCMP.com</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/">Strategic Defense</category>
			<dc:creator>erikh</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/new-great-wall-china-digital-4901.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>China freezes US military exchanges! What do you think?</title>
			<link>http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/china-freezes-us-military-exchanges-what-do-you-think-4905.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:32:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[China freezes US military exchanges   
  
  
China says the deal 'seriously endangers' its national security and reunification efforts with Taiwan [EPA]  
  
Beijing has suspended exchange of visits between the Chinese and US armed forces scheduled for Sunday, over Washington's plan to sell arms to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>China freezes US military exchanges  <br />
 <br />
 <br />
China says the deal 'seriously endangers' its national security and reunification efforts with Taiwan [EPA] <br />
 <br />
Beijing has suspended exchange of visits between the Chinese and US armed forces scheduled for Sunday, over Washington's plan to sell arms to Taiwan, according to the official Xinhua news agency.<br />
<br />
The decision was announced on Saturday, just hours after the US was cautioned that its decision to sell $6.4bn worth of weapons to Taiwan would cause &quot;serious damage&quot; to relations and co-operation between the two nations.<br />
<br />
He Yafei, the Chinese vice-foreign minister, told Jon Huntsman, the US ambassador to China, that the arms deal could jeopardise bonds with Washington.<br />
<br />
The sale &quot;constitutes a gross intervention into China's internal affairs, seriously endangers China's national security and harms China's peaceful reunification efforts,&quot; Wang Baodong, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, quoted He as saying.<br />
<br />
&quot;The US plan will definitely undermine China-US relations and bring about serious negative impact on exchange and co-operation in major areas between the two countries,&quot; he said, adding that &quot;China strongly urges the US side to fully recognise the gravity of the issue, revoke the erroneous decision on arms sales to Taiwan and stop selling any weapons to Taiwan&quot;.<br />
<br />
Taiwan reaction<br />
<br />
Taiwan welcomed the US decision, with Ma Ying-jeou, the president, saiying the sales would help the island to further develop ties with China.<br />
<br />
&quot;It will let Taiwan feel more confident and secure so we can have more interactions with China,&quot; Ma was quoted by Taiwan's Central News Agency as saying.<br />
<br />
Christian Ford, the Beijing bureau chief for the US newspaper Christian Science Monitor, said that while tensions between China and the US have been rising, ties between China and Taiwan have been abating recently.<br />
<br />
&quot;The two sides have been discussing trade and investment issues ... there are now many more flights from Beijing to Taiwan,&quot; Ford told Al Jazeera.<br />
<br />
&quot;The actual situation in the streets is not tense. In fact, it's a great deal less tense than a couple of years ago.<br />
<br />
&quot;But when you look at relations between and Washington and Beijing, there are definitely some more hick-ups on the horizon&quot; Ford said, mentioning an expected meeting between Barack Obama, the US president, the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader.<br />
<br />
&quot;When that happens, Beijing is bound to react.&quot;<br />
<br />
Renegade province<br />
<br />
Beijing regards Taiwan as a renegade province and has vowed to bring the island eventually back under mainland rule, by force if necessary.<br />
<br />
The US government, on the other hand, is bound by the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act which obliges Washington to ensure the island is capable of responding to Chinese threats, and to sell defensive weapons to it.<br />
<br />
Wang said that the weapons deal violated the 1982 communique between China and the United States, which said the arms sales to Taiwan &quot;will not exceed, in qualitative or in quantitative terms,&quot; the level in the years before that.<br />
<br />
Philip Crowley, a state department spokesman, said that the arms sales were consistent with the three key communiques between the United States and China when they normalised relations.<br />
<br />
In 2008, China suspended most military dialogue with Washington after the administration of George Bush, the former president, approved a $6.5bn arms package to Taiwan that included guided missiles and attack helicopters.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/">Strategic Defense</category>
			<dc:creator>A.Man</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/strategic-defense/china-freezes-us-military-exchanges-what-do-you-think-4905.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
