PLA deployment against India

u mean me? na, its mi 1st time here mate, dont no y im here, maybe coz im bored, just lukin ramdom stuffs on interenet, thought this is coool,lol

Originally Posted by vincelee

is that you BritBoi?

have you returned to terrorize SDF?

it's him.

somebody ban him please. ban his whole IP in fact

Now cool down, lets not make any assumptions yet. But Essexboi, you should notice that we have certain rules about posting so i advice you to take a good look at them before posting

oi oi wat u talkin about mate!?
i aint got a bloody clue who da hack is that britboi, i like chinese stuffs, wats wrong with it? y should i get da ban??????

Originally Posted by Indianfighter

I may daresay that the 1962 Sino-Indian war was probably the first war in modern times, in which the victors lost far more soldiers than the defeated side.

But China cannot repeat a 1962 today, because :

a] Indian armed forces have modernised significantly since then.

b] There cannot be forced mass-recruitment of young boys and men from rural areas and pushed into the war because China has also come a long way from Mao-style dictatorship.

my oh my, aren't what they say true.............

yer mate, i dont fink india boiz can stand a chance in da war with bruce lee boiz

and plz, whoever that is(written in red), dont get rid off my message, free speech innt?!

Respectfully IndianFighter in mountainous areas the infilterated force
has the advantage once it's in a good defensive postition which can be
resupplied.

Since China and India would BOTH have access to aircraft and artillery
the first side to infilterate would be virtually impossible to remove

First of all Essexboi, free speach in here is limited to reasonable saying. Sofar you haven't showed any. Your posting is imature, ridicilous and completly useless so i might just edit it out right away. Didn't you read what i said? GET FAMILIAR TO THE FORUM RULES BEFORE POSTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here are examples of your misconducts:

1. Flaming arguments and country bashing We don't allow any thrash against any nation in here. All Indian related topics and statements are under special observation as so many other beside you cannot talk maturely over the issue.

2. Overall contest of your posts If your posts are only oneliners and one sentences, you might just spare us for your "insights" eg. keep quiet untill you have something reasonable to say. We are trying to enstabilish a respectfull military forum so statements like yer mate, i dont fink india boiz can stand a chance in da war with bruce lee boiz doesen't really fit on the matter....

3. Disrespectful behaivior towards forum leaders If moderator advices you to do something, you better do it before the moderator has to tell you to do it. And if you still wont obey, well quess who's name is next on the ban list

Now are these things clear? Good, then you can spend little more time to learn the other rules as well and you are then welcomed to participating.

India lost the 1962 war because Indian troops were outnumbered almost 1:30 in most theaters. The overall ratio was heavily against India.

Chinese troops suffered many more casualties than Indian troops. One lone Indian soldier manning a post killed 50 Chinese soldiers (when they attempted to climb up to his post), before he was martyred.

Today that numerical inferiority does not exist, and hence China cannot launch an attack on India on the same scale/strategy as 1962.

Originally Posted by Indianfighter

India lost the 1962 war because Indian troops were outnumbered almost 1:30 in most theaters. The overall ratio was heavily against India.

You are talking about BS here, please don't make stupid statement like this without backing up with facts.

Chinese troops suffered many more casualties than Indian troops. One lone Indian soldier manning a post killed 50 Chinese soldiers (when they attempted to climb up to his post), before he was martyred.

You should be mature enough to know that is just fake information, one man against 50 you are out of your mind.

Today that numerical inferiority does not exist, and hence China cannot launch an attack on India on the same scale/strategy as 1962.

*******

KYli, I know these numbers are out of the mind too, but please show some respect!!! Don't try to abuse the emoticons!!!!! What break? You give me a break!

Yes uts true , Chinese suffered more casualty than the Indians in 62 though Indian army was completely routed !!

Actually Chinese were using wave-style attacks , means charging posts with a large army which appeared as sea waves . In this situation the indian soldiers got time to empty their LMGs and Chinese had casualty, but they did win the battle and in a short time !!!

Actually Chinese were using their tactics of Korean war , charging with a lot of men, making sound with whistles , shouting , etc . But Indians were not Americans !!!!!

China/India conflicts in 60s is history now, there is no point to discuss this in this post. This post is about the CURRENT chinese deployment along the border.

As far as I know, there are only some border patrol units along the China/India border. These units may not even from PLA, they might be armed police forces.

Far away from the border, there is a mountain division stationed either in Yuan Nan or Si Chuan.

There is no immediate concerns about possible China/India conflicts. Parkistan/India conflicts are also not likely to happen since both countries have got their nukes.

However, in case of emergency, PLA can quickly mobilize their troops and deploy them to this region. There are one fast reaction division each in the Cheng Du and Lan Zhou military district. Also recently, China has finished the construction of a railway from Lan Zhou to Tibet, which obviously will help the movement of these troops.

There are probably very few air fields in that region though.

Originally Posted by ArjunMk1

Yes uts true , Chinese suffered more casualty than the Indians in 62 though Indian army was completely routed !!

The official chinese casualty record showed 1460 killed and wounded. It is generally accepted by the west. Some people put the PLA number as high as 3000, and put the India number of killed and wounded about 4000 which did not included the 7000 who surrended.

http://www.onwar.com

Originally Posted by Greyfalcon

I'd like to know the details of the PLA deployment in the TAR and against India. Can anyone provide these ?

Going back to the original question...

The PRC has 2 military regions that border India, Chengdu MR to the east (eastern India), and Lanzhou to the north (Northern India). These military regions cover a wide area and units deployed within are spread out and not concentrated along the border. You can read about the forces here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...pla-ground.htm