Or, no need for mobility.
This is a discussion on HQ-7 deployed to protect the Olympics within the Army forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Here's an article from yahoo news on HQ-7 being deployed to protect 2008 Olympics. Looks like they prefer the HQ-7 ...
Here's an article from yahoo news on HQ-7 being deployed to protect 2008 Olympics. Looks like they prefer the HQ-7 over the TOR-M1 for this job.
Beijing gets ground-to-air defense
By STEPHEN WADE, AP Sports Writer Tue Jun 24, 11:22 AM ET
BEIJING - China has stationed a battery of ground-to-air missiles just 300 yards from a Beijing Olympic venue, the latest sign of tightening security with the games just 6 1/2 weeks away.
The fenced-off military compound has been set up just south of the Olympic Sports Center Stadium, a venue for soccer and modern pentathlon. It's also within a half mile of the Water Cube and the Bird's Nest National Stadium, the $450 million showpiece venue of the games.
At least two Hongqi 7 missile launchers were visible behind a 7-foot fence, with military hardware and vehicles hidden under camouflage netting. Dozen of soldiers guarded the compound on Tuesday with a notice posted on the fence: "Military Administrative District No Admittance."
The Beijing Olympics are intended to showcase the country's rising political and economic power. But the intense media scrutiny is also giving environmentalists and political activists with grievances a potential stage for protest, which could lead to a public-relations disaster for the image-conscious communist government.
The Athens Olympics four years ago were also under tight security with Patriot anti-aircraft missiles stationed around the city. Those games came just three years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States.
China has beefed up security efforts since deadly rioting in Tibet broke out on March 14, followed by pro-Tibet protests on international legs of the torch relay.
On at least three occasions this year, authorities say they foiled plots by separatists from Xinjiang — the far western, Muslim-dominated region of China — that targeted the Olympics. The plots included alleged attempts to crash an airliner and kidnap athletes and journalists.
Little evidence has been provided, however, and many foreign security experts question the scale of the threat while rights groups say Beijing may be using terrorism as cover for crackdowns on legitimate peaceful dissent.
Last week Beijing said it had mobilized a 100,000-strong anti-terrorism force to guard against Olympic threats. Police commandos, specialist units and regular army troops made up the force. It also included the paramilitary Snow Wolf Commando Unit, which will handle terrorist alerts and public unrest during the Aug. 8-24 games.
China has toughened visa rules ahead of the games, targeting students and business officials who travel frequently to the country. This has been coupled with frequent sweeps of areas where foreigners live, with police checking documents and residence permits.
With less then two months before the start of the games, TV broadcasters remain embroiled in a fight with Chinese organizers over coverage away from the sports venues. They say they may be hindered from moving freely around the city and reporting the games, a promise Beijing made when it was awarded the games seven years ago.
Or, no need for mobility.
I've always wondered why the HQ-7 was selected over the LY-60.
In terms of raw performance, at least on paper, the LY-60 appears to be superior to the HQ-7 (original version) and HQ-61. Yet only the Pakistani Navy used the LY-60N, while Italian navy use the original Aspide variant, as well as exporting the land-based Skyguard system abroad. You hardly see any PLA units with LY-60 SAM.
Pakistani Navy: (6-cel LY-60N)
Italian Navy: (Aspide SAM)
Velos Skyguard w/Aspide SAM in Greece:
Last edited by adeptitus; 09-03-2008 at 05:18 PM.
Maybe it was because HQ-7 flew lower and was lighter? That makes it harder to ditch and able to take on cruise missiles. PLAN is coming out with long range SAMs anyway so these self defence SAMs can affordable to be shorter ranged. Land wise, the lighter missile could have meant easier logistics.
Just my 2 cents.
I want Asia on my front porch and America as my backyard.
Disclaimer: By America, I meant the Continent. And yes, I know Asian homes have neither a backyard nor a porch in the American sense.
I've read rumors of local copy of Tor-M1 being mass produced as well. Tor does have the advantage of firing on the move and greater off-road mobility over the wheeled HQ-7 launchers. In terms of accuracy and ability to hit different types of targets, I would say the latest versions of both should be comparable, as they share the command guidance paradigm and software is just software.
I think HQ-7 is too old !
This missile looks like an HQ-7, but its launcher seems to be a new toy. Looks like the HQ-7 has a new version now.
The HQ-7 also has the other advantage that it is command guided. That means the missile can be controlled by other means besides radar, like using a TV camera, thermal or electro optical means. This means the missile can be immune from ECM or stealth measures.
"Lets do a thermal sweep."