This is a discussion on PLAAF AWACS thread within the Air Force forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; A new build KJ-200 for PLANAF (from huitong)? Interesting different paint scheme and tail... seems to be the PLAN's flag?...
A new build KJ-200 for PLANAF (from huitong)?
Interesting different paint scheme and tail... seems to be the PLAN's flag?
CARRIER HAS ARRIVED! ^^
don't know about anything else, but the colour of the number indicates PLAN special missions aircraft. And also, it looks to be a 4 digit number. Other than that, we've seen a photos of PLAN KJ-200 a while ago. I just don't think it was ever fully revealed. I'm sure the regiment is operational by now. If you check scramble's website, you can see it in the 1st independent regiment.
Yes .. but yesterday there was no photo, not even a link and I had no access to Huitong's page.
Thanks again, Deino
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZO4pRchW0p...us%2BAWACS.jpg
sorry imagehost is down
Modularised carrier AWAC ? :
´«ËµÖеĹú²ú½¢ÔØÔ¤¾¯»ú·½°¸£¿_Èý¾üÂÛ̳_¾üÊÂÂÛ̳_ÐÂÀ ËÍø
Do the tail booms telescope to save space on the carrier? They look too thin to be stiff enough even without that feature.
I think it would make more sense to build a delta winged tailless aircraft to carry the radar antennae and the operators instead of a conventional aircraft with a dish on top. Needs less height below deck, has a low structural weight, plenty of space for crew equipment and fuel and a greater building height for the antennae.
You mean sort of like a B-2 shaped plane with dish?
I mean B-2 shaped or delta shaped, with a relatively thick profiles and with the antenna elements in the leading edge, in front of the trailing edge and probably also in side looking antennae on the top and under side. Where will we put the engines? How large will the fuselage have to be? Perhaps no fuselage at all? Certainly no dish.
Such an aircraft will save on drag and weight and so can use a smaller wing span. This is welcome in the limited space of an aircraft carrier deck.
Last edited by delft; 09-06-2011 at 05:10 AM. Reason: addition
Seems as if the first ZDK-03 for the PAF is ready !
Nice .... with the no. 733 it seems a prototype / testbed and not for the PAK. !?
Bookmarks