SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

New J-10 thread II

This is a discussion on New J-10 thread II within the Air Force forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/?p=2191 has anyone heard about this? Chengdu, Dec 27 (China Defense Mashup Report) — Several eyewitnesses in Chengdu city prove ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Air Force

China Defence Today Forum


Air Force Forum for Chinese Air Force, military aviation news, PLAAF weapons technology and warfare. Discuss air force aircraft systems, organization and PLAAF equipment such as fighter aircraft, bombers, missiles, AWACS, transport aircraft and including future requirements.

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Closed Thread

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2008   #991
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
mkruo is on a distinguished road
Breaking News! Greatly Improved J-10 Fighter First Flight in China

http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/?p=2191

has anyone heard about this?

Chengdu, Dec 27 (China Defense Mashup Report) — Several eyewitnesses in Chengdu city prove that a greatly improved J-10 fighter makes its first flight from CAC (Chengdu Aircraft Corporation) internal airport in Huang Tianba (黄田坝).

One Chinese Artist’s CG Imagine Image of Improved J-10 Fighter

Some spectators say that the eyeable improvements include a DSI inlet, Forward Looking Infra Red (FLIR) Pod and Tail Wing-tip Integrated Electrical Avionics. Besides, some Internet resources claim that new J-10 has equipped with high-performance AESA radar, modified wing inner structure and stealth in-board pylons. The engine is still the Russian AL-31F, which will be replaced by FADEC AL-31FM3 for better air performance. But China’s WS-10 engine also has opportunity.

The flight lasts about 10 minutes and the test pilot is believed to be Liang Wanjun (梁万俊).

Although closing to 3.5th+ generation fighters like Typhoon and Rafael, how many new J-10 fighters will be purchansed by PLA Air Force is still one question, because CAC and SAC have entered the drastic competition for PLA’s 5th generation fighter. There always a rumar that CAC will provide prototype fighter before 2012.

Choosing New J-10 or investing future combat aircraft ? Who knows!

mkruo, I moved your post to the already existing J-10 thread.

bd popeye super moderator

Last edited by bd popeye; 12-28-2008 at 10:02 PM.
mkruo is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #992
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 160
kickars is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
Depends, certain stuff you know right away is junk, certain stuff you keep in the back of your mind, certain stuff you treat more seriously. I would put this somewhere between back of my head and seriously.

I can say this, from the people that posted recently, it appears something dramatic happened very recently at CAC. It looks like the first flight of a plane. Now whether or not that is J-10B or J-10B with AESA radar or something, that's something I don't know exactly. But from the past, I would say there were pretty good sources that indicate J-10B had already flied. As always, wait for more news.
I also saw something on fyjs couple of days ago. But they only confirmed that J-10B test plane had a taxi run at CAC's airfield recently (didn't actualy take off).

Most importantly the guy who leaked the info says J-10B has two new features or designs similar to what they have on FC-1/JF-17. Most people on fyjs seems to think they are the new DSI intake and JF-17 style tail design. And its wing design has also got some new features which can be found on EF2000's wing deign. What's more, IRST has also been installed which is the same as the one on J-11B. Finally there's a new PESA like the one on Su-35BM.

That's all. time will tell if they are true.

Last edited by kickars; 12-28-2008 at 09:10 AM.
kickars is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #993
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 143
Munir is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

It reminds me that respected posters here told me that JF17 was inferior to J10 and J11... So why adding those outdated cheap features on a much more potent and high tech plane? Not to make a joke but serious something that seems to be totally not logical. Is it a downgraded J10 for export market to Pakistan?
Munir is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #994
Super Moderator
 
tphuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,093
tphuang is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Londo Molari View Post
J-10 is physically smaller/lighter than Eurofighter/Rafale, J-10 is a lot closer to F-16 in size.

So if the rumors about AESA are true, I guess you could say "F-16 Block 60" class.
you could say that, but J-10 in general is far more geared for A2A than F-16 E/F
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickars View Post
I also saw something on fyjs couple of days ago. But they only confirmed that J-10B test plane had a taxi run at CAC's airfield recently (didn't actualy take off).

Most importantly the guy who leaked the info says J-10B has two new features or designs similar to what they have on FC-1/JF-17. Most people on fyjs seems to think they are the new DSI intake and JF-17 style tail design. And its wing design has also got some new features which can be found on EF2000's wing deign. What's more, IRST has also been installed which is the same as the one on J-11B. Finally there's a new PESA like the one on Su-35BM.

That's all. time will tell if they are true.
he is not talking about JF-17 style tail design, but rather they are putting ECM package on tail like they did for JF-17. And by the way, thanks for your great work at re-awaking munir into arguing that JF-17 is amazing and China is lucky that this Pakistani assistance can be used to improve J-10, which is an overrated fighter jet hyped by Chinese fanboys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munir View Post
It reminds me that respected posters here told me that JF17 was inferior to J10 and J11... So why adding those outdated cheap features on a much more potent and high tech plane? Not to make a joke but serious something that seems to be totally not logical. Is it a downgraded J10 for export market to Pakistan?
Okay, JF-17 is inferior, that's a fact. I'm frankly getting tired of your delusion. We are not even sure at this point how valid these claims are. They can certainly DSI intake to J-10 if they wanted to sacrifice supersonic flight performance for reduced RCS and better subsonic flight performance. They can certainly move ECM package if they want.
tphuang is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #995
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 143
Munir is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

I did not become personal and just was trying to understand why these developments are probably now under development. It reminds me of many posts where you personal posted option A and if anyone thought about option B it was wrong. Now I copied exact your conclusion and now I am delusional. Wow (not the positive version). I did pushed the right button, didn't I?
Munir is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #996
Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 499
Engineer is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

I don't think J-10 is going to have a DSI. Putting a DSI on to the J-10 is nothing but some fanboys' idea, found entirely on reasoning that the current intake is not pretty. I think we all know how relevent prettiness is to performance.
Engineer is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #997
Super Moderator
 
tphuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,093
tphuang is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munir View Post
I did not become personal and just was trying to understand why these developments are probably now under development. It reminds me of many posts where you personal posted option A and if anyone thought about option B it was wrong. Now I copied exact your conclusion and now I am delusional. Wow (not the positive version). I did pushed the right button, didn't I?
90% of your recent post is about why China needs to buy JF-17 and that J-10 is not a superior fighter. Plus, you find it hard to believe that China would have the audacity to not export its best stuff to Pakistan. And you simply continued that trend here.

this is my conclusion as earlier posted.
"I can say this, from the people that posted recently, it appears something dramatic happened very recently at CAC. It looks like the first flight of a plane. Now whether or not that is J-10B or J-10B with AESA radar or something, that's something I don't know exactly. But from the past, I would say there were pretty good sources that indicate J-10B had already flied. As always, wait for more news."
did you copy my conclusion?
tphuang is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #998
Senior Member
 
AssassinsMace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
AssassinsMace is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

It seems that there are flurry of reports that the upgraded J-10(B?) has flown a test flight and was seen by witnesses in Chengdu. We'll see if anyone caught some pics anytime soon. If it's true, is there any reason why it seems that new developments come out at the end of the year a lot?
AssassinsMace is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #999
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 144
Lundblad.Jeff is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
"I can say this, from the people that posted recently, it appears something dramatic happened very recently at CAC. It looks like the first flight of a plane. Now whether or not that is J-10B or J-10B with AESA radar or something, that's something I don't know exactly. But from the past, I would say there were pretty good sources that indicate J-10B had already flied. As always, wait for more news."
I think you are right. Something new has flown, but I don't think it was the J-11B. Most sources put at least 3 J-11B prototypes flying back in 2006. If the J-11B entered production in 2007 as many people are saying, then based on China's production rate of the J-11A, China probably has around 25+ J-11B's or so by now.

I don't think eyewitnesses would be able to spot the difference between an AESA J-11 and a regular J-11, so again we're back to where we started.

On another website it was reported that a new J-10 was spotted, not a J-11.
Lundblad.Jeff is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #1000
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 200
jackbh is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

What is DSI? I know is a particular kind of air intake that reduces signature, but what does DSI stand for?

What other types of aircraft uses DSI intake?
jackbh is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #1001
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 533
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundblad.Jeff View Post
I think you are right. Something new has flown, but I don't think it was the J-11B. Most sources put at least 3 J-11B prototypes flying back in 2006. If the J-11B entered production in 2007 as many people are saying, then based on China's production rate of the J-11A, China probably has around 25+ J-11B's or so by now.

I don't think eyewitnesses would be able to spot the difference between an AESA J-11 and a regular J-11, so again we're back to where we started.

On another website it was reported that a new J-10 was spotted, not a J-11.
Err? I thought we were talking about the J-10B, not the J-11B.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackbh
What is DSI? I know is a particular kind of air intake that reduces signature, but what does DSI stand for?

What other types of aircraft uses DSI intake?
Divertless Supersonic Intakes

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_Di...rsonic_Intakes

here is a very basic explanation because I'm really lazy

Quote:
Divertless Supersonic Intakes (DSI) is an air intake that was designed for supersonic flight regime, so the plane doesnīt need to have any variable-geometry airintake, thatīs why it is called DSI. In supersoniv flight regime, it is hard for an airplane to turn, especially kulbit. In order to gain airflow to the engine, most fighters uses variable-geometry air intakes, or moving air intakes that we could found in F-22, or Su-27, or MiG-29, or any other fighters. Fighter such like F-35 doesnīt need any moving parts because it uses DSI. DSI automatically gain airflow to the engine in supersonic flight regime.
Semi-Lobster is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #1002
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 144
Lundblad.Jeff is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Lobster View Post
Err? I thought we were talking about the J-10B, not the J-11B.
Sorry, I misread that. Someone earlier mentioned that the new craft looked like a J-11 with modifications to the tail.

I think a J-10 with a DSI inlet it quite likely given that China has proven itself to have the technology on the JF-17.

I found a new article that seems to be saying that the J-10B made its maiden flight. Google translate isn't very good though, translation anyone?

http://military.china.com/zh_cn/crit.../15257658.html

Here is another website, also reporting that the J-10B has made its first flight.

http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/?p=2191

Not sure how reliable these are, I hope we get some real pictures soon.

Last edited by bd popeye; 12-28-2008 at 09:59 PM.
Lundblad.Jeff is offline  
Old 12-28-2008   #1003
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 116
escobar is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

I hope that there will be on J 10B a Link 16 systems that USAF uses
escobar is offline  
Old 12-29-2008   #1004
Super Moderator
 
Gollevainen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I aint no stranger, been this place before...
Posts: 4,510
Gollevainen is on a distinguished road
Re: New J-10 thread II

Thread closed as it's way too big, over 1,000 replies. Please start a new one.
Thank you

Gollevainen
Supermoderator
__________________

Ooh, your custard pie, yeah, sweet and nice
When you cut it, mama, save me a slice


...and you can have your slice at:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Gollevainen is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13