SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

This is a discussion on The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft within the Air Force forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; I thought a proper thread to discuss the older and (mostly) retired aircraft of the PLAAF and PLANAF was in ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Air Force

China Defence Today Forum


Air Force Forum for Chinese Air Force, military aviation news, PLAAF weapons technology and warfare. Discuss air force aircraft systems, organization and PLAAF equipment such as fighter aircraft, bombers, missiles, AWACS, transport aircraft and including future requirements.

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2008   #1
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

I thought a proper thread to discuss the older and (mostly) retired aircraft of the PLAAF and PLANAF was in order, hopefully this thread can be a hub of discussion for older aircraft.

So here's my first question. A lot of sites talk about the 'J-4' but from what I understand that the J-4 designation was never used. Was I wrong or are there just a lot of incorrect info floating around? Secondly I'm having trouble getting more information on the J-3 and J-2... I know they exist but finding sites on them in English or Chinese is kind of hard (they all re-direct to speculation pages on the J-13 and J-14) Also, who buit these aircraft, were they all imported from Russia? Also, I assume there was never a J-1 because I've never heard of it being mentioned.

Secondly, does anybody have any information on the 'Shenyang FT-1' http://www.sac.com.cn/eng/military/FT-1.htm ? Did it ever enter production?

Thirdly a question about the cancelled Nanchang (now Hongdu) J-12. Does anybody have a site detailing its history of development? I know it was mean't to meet a PLAAF requirement for a light, STOL, but, it was only 10 metres long! It seems like a fighter designed from another era with more in common with the Folland Gnat than the F-5.
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008   #2
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

The J-5 was the first jet fighter China actually started to produce. That would be the MiG-17. Prior to that, MiG-15s had all been imported, but none domestically produced.

The first jet fighter ever imported to China and wore the PLAAF insignia was the MiG-9. That was based on a secret project Messerschmitt concocted in the closing days of World War II. A few of these aircraft are still in some museums in China.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008   #3
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
The J-5 was the first jet fighter China actually started to produce. That would be the MiG-17. Prior to that, MiG-15s had all been imported, but none domestically produced.

The first jet fighter ever imported to China and wore the PLAAF insignia was the MiG-9. That was based on a secret project Messerschmitt concocted in the closing days of World War II. A few of these aircraft are still in some museums in China.
So the MiG-17 was the first Chinese built jet fighter and before that the designation of imported Soviet aircraft was not changed? Also wasn't the Yakovlev Yak-17 also imported as well to China?

I'm still trying to figure out what this jet trainer is based on. It seems to be a specificly purpose built jet trainer which is certainly something the Soviet Union never did. From what I've read, it was a completely indigenously designed aircraft amazingly enough but it seems beyond one built it never really entered service it seems.
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008   #4
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

The SAC jet seems completely indigenous and yet I never heard of it until now. I guess they don't show a lot of stuff until now. That certainly makes it the first Chinese indigenous jet. Originally I thought SAC's J-12 of 1966 was the first indigenous Chinese jet. Now make that the first supersonic jet.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008   #5
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
The SAC jet seems completely indigenous and yet I never heard of it until now. I guess they don't show a lot of stuff until now. That certainly makes it the first Chinese indigenous jet. Originally I thought SAC's J-12 of 1966 was the first indigenous Chinese jet. Now make that the first supersonic jet.
The Chinese designation for the 'FT-1' seems to be JJ-1. It seems that the Chinese don't really talk much about it except in passing. I still can't figure what happened, either the prototype crashed or there was a revised training system for fighter aircraft and the JJ-1 did not meet the requirements
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #6
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

A while back I thought I read somewhere that the Bangladeshi F-7BGs are BVR capable and were armed with MRAAMs but recently I have read another article saying that its nearly identical to the J-7G in terms of avionics and only has a range of about 30km, and is armed with only short range missiles. Is this correct?
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #7
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 263
yehe is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
The J-5 was the first jet fighter China actually started to produce. That would be the MiG-17. Prior to that, MiG-15s had all been imported, but none domestically produced.

The first jet fighter ever imported to China and wore the PLAAF insignia was the MiG-9. That was based on a secret project Messerschmitt concocted in the closing days of World War II. A few of these aircraft are still in some museums in China.
Actually I think SAC did produced J4 as well, which is Mig 15
yehe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #8
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by yehe View Post
Actually I think SAC did produced J4 as well, which is Mig 15
So did the J-4 exist or did it not exist? I'm still confused over this
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #9
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Lobster View Post
A while back I thought I read somewhere that the Bangladeshi F-7BGs are BVR capable and were armed with MRAAMs but recently I have read another article saying that its nearly identical to the J-7G in terms of avionics and only has a range of about 30km, and is armed with only short range missiles. Is this correct?
I doubt that the radar is BVRAAM capable. As for the range, even a small radar like that should have a range in excess of 30km. I would speculate 50 to 60km is possible using range while search. However, on a track while scan function it should go down to 20 to 30km. If the radar is the SY-80, which operates at Ku band, not like the KLJ-6E at X-band, the range maybe shorter but on the other hand, the resolving and tracking power is even greater.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #10
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
I doubt that the radar is BVRAAM capable. As for the range, even a small radar like that should have a range in excess of 30km. I would speculate 50 to 60km is possible using range while search. However, on a track while scan function it should go down to 20 to 30km. If the radar is the SY-80, which operates at Ku band, not like the KLJ-6E at X-band, the range maybe shorter but on the other hand, the resolving and tracking power is even greater.
Well thats the thing, the F-7BG does use the KLJ-6E, the same the Chinese J-7G which as far as I can tell, has an effective range of about 30km. This article http://www.***************/index.php...article&id=250 says that while the F-7BG had BVR while in the same article only said it had a range of 30km. Then again this article is a bit suspect. After the first few paragraphs its word-for-word copy of this article from a Sri Lankan Newspaper http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/...069_space.html about the Sri Lankan F-7GS

EDIT: Hmmm... thats weird, it won't seem to let me show the link, strange....
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #11
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

30km is the range of the old JL-7. So the article is kind of suspect. If the radar is the KLJ-6E, that radar does not have the BVR mode. The KLJ-6F with emphasis on the F is the one that does.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #12
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
30km is the range of the old JL-7. So the article is kind of suspect. If the radar is the KLJ-6E, that radar does not have the BVR mode. The KLJ-6F with emphasis on the F is the one that does.
Oh wait, I got the articles mixed up, the BG it seems DOES have the KLJ-6F, it is the Sri Lankan F-7GS that uses the KLJ-6E.

About the KLJ-6F, what is the range of it. How different is it from the KLJ-6E used by PLAAF's J-7G. BTW I understand that the J-7E/G make a mediocre MRAAM platform because of its small range and fuel capacity, even with the additonal fuel capacity from the redesigned wing, but why did they not upgrade the J-7G with the KLJ-6F? Was it not cost effective? Is the difference in performance not different enough?

Last edited by Semi-Lobster; 12-19-2008 at 10:11 PM.
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #13
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

There is no published info about range on the brochures of the KLJ-6F so far. The only difference it appears to have the -E version is the additional modes necessary to support BVRAAM. There might be an increase in performance but that's only speculative.

As for the PLAAF J-7G, its impossible to tell or with absolute certainty what they installed is the -E or the -F. So far we have never seen operational J-7G with the PL-12. If we have pictures to show, then there is proof. Its likely the -F was developed after the -E, and after the J-7G was certified with the -E, so -F may have came too late. The J-7G program began around 2003 and 2004, and there was no info on the KLJ-6F until 2006-2007.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2008   #14
Junior Member
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
Semi-Lobster is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
There is no published info about range on the brochures of the KLJ-6F so far. The only difference it appears to have the -E version is the additional modes necessary to support BVRAAM. There might be an increase in performance but that's only speculative.

As for the PLAAF J-7G, its impossible to tell or with absolute certainty what they installed is the -E or the -F. So far we have never seen operational J-7G with the PL-12. If we have pictures to show, then there is proof. Its likely the -F was developed after the -E, and after the J-7G was certified with the -E, so -F may have came too late. The J-7G program began around 2003 and 2004, and there was no info on the KLJ-6F until 2006-2007.
Production of the G has already ended hasn't it? IIRC All domestic J-7 prouction has ended, its all F-7MGs now for export although this is all from memory. Speaking of the J-7G, I think awhile back I read about a 'J-7G2', I don't think this is real though since generally thats not how Chinese aircraft designations work, maybe its referring to a late batch of J-Gs with additional features
Semi-Lobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2008   #15
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,878
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: The J-7 and older PLAAF aircraft

I think the production of J-7G ended even before the F-7BG.

If the improvement is minor, using a designation like J-7G1 or G2 might be possible. If the improvement is relatively greater, it may deserve a new letter, though H is already taken. The next letter would be I.

I think CAC is just hurting itself trying to push a BVRAAMed J-7 if they can better sell J-10s or JF-17s to the PLAAF.
__________________
"Lets do a thermal sweep."
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large aircraft carriers compared planeman World Armed Forces 11 11-01-2008 01:24 PM
Fc-20 = J-10? Vlad Plasmius Air Force 57 03-09-2008 12:01 AM
U.S.built Iranian aircraft DPRKPTboat World Armed Forces 14 03-13-2006 05:28 PM
Growing Asymmetries in the China-Japan Naval Balance crazyinsane105 Navy 42 01-14-2006 11:48 AM


vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13