SinoDefence Forum

Chinese Defense & Military Community

China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

This is a discussion on China plan small space shutter within 3 year. within the Air Force forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Just imagine if Dr Tsien was still with the Amercans when the concept of the shuttle was being explored. His ...

Go Back   China Defence Today Forum > China Defense & Military > Air Force

China Defence Today Forum


Air Force Forum for Chinese Air Force, military aviation news, PLAAF weapons technology and warfare. Discuss air force aircraft systems, organization and PLAAF equipment such as fighter aircraft, bombers, missiles, AWACS, transport aircraft and including future requirements.

DefenceTalk Military Pictures






Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2008   #31
Senior Member
 
bladerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Queenstown/Melbourne
Posts: 1,472
bladerunner is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

Just imagine if Dr Tsien was still with the Amercans when the concept of the shuttle was being explored. His influence might have come through because in his concepts he had the shuttle perched on the top of the launch rockets.That way none of that insulation stuff would have damaged the shuttle. I wonder if his concept would have been better
bladerunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008   #32
Da Grand Pubah
 
bd popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids Iowa
Posts: 9,191
bd popeye is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

Quote:
because it screw up.
Huh?? This is incrediable. the US has a very sucessful space program that is still in operation. Russia space program is barely decernable and you think the US screwed up because they are using a tried and true technology. A technology that is updated constanly.

Truely, I fail to see the logic in your statement.
__________________
Discover the Chinese and World Military picture threads!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


..And the Chinese Daily Life Photo thread!!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


..And don't forget

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"
bd popeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008   #33
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,877
crobato is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

How can the Russian space program be barely discernible when they're the ones sending up American astronauts to the ISS?
crobato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008   #34
Da Grand Pubah
 
bd popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids Iowa
Posts: 9,191
bd popeye is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crobato View Post
How can the Russian space program be barely discernible when they're the ones sending up American astronauts to the ISS?
Perhaps those words are a little strong..

I should have posted the Russian space program , while active, is not as robust and active as it once was.
__________________
Discover the Chinese and World Military picture threads!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


..And the Chinese Daily Life Photo thread!!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


..And don't forget

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"
bd popeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008   #35
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 244
montyp165 is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

The Buran design did seem to be a better overall setup than the US shuttle, too bad it never had the chance to become fully operational.
montyp165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2008   #36
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 22
Surpluswarrior is on a distinguished road
Re: China plan small space shutter within 3 year.

I've been reading a lot about the space shuttle program and space programs on astronautix and other great sites. I learned a few things:

1. The concept of a winged orbiter like the shuttle is valid. The Space Shuttle is perhaps not the best implementation of this concept, however.

-The shuttle was apparently designed to meet a military requirement to carry and retrieve a "big bird" satellite from orbit. By the time the shuttle was built, this requirement no longer existed. So the shuttle was built larger than necessary.

A smaller shuttle with a less impressive cargo bay, for instance, could have been designed for a more gentle re-entry, perhaps avoiding the need for the heat-tiles used by the shuttle.

-If the shuttle had been smaller and launched from the top of the booster stack, so many problems could have been avoided. Pieces of debris falling down and hitting the shuttle's thermal tiles during liftoff would not occur, since the shuttle would be above all the launch debris.

-If the boosters that exploded during the Challenger launch had been designed differently, perhaps as one giant unit instead of different parts that were assembled later, the Challenger disaster might have been avoided. (I believe Buran used this alternate concept.)

So, with a few changes (a smaller shuttle that launched from the top of a stack that used alternate boosters), the shuttle could have been a safer and cheaper launch platform.

That aside, it has a good safety record, but the complexity and layout of the shuttle led to very high operating costs. Plus, if it had used disposable engines that were swapped out after the mission was over (like Buran), it might have been cheaper to refit after the mission. There are probably other ways in which the reusability could have been cheaper.

In short, the shuttle is impressive, but maybe would have benefited from a few iterations beforehand, to lay down exactly what the space program needed, and iron out flawed concepts beforehand.
Surpluswarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



vBulletin Tweet Poster

  0 
   

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
SinoDefenceForum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13