This is a discussion on China Flanker Thread II within the Air Force forums, part of the China Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by Hyperwarp tremendously more powerful engines? what engine is that? WS-10 on the J-11B produces 125 kN of ...
You are referring to the base WS-10, which did not enter service with the military. The "A" variant, used by the J11B and J15, produces 132 kN of thrust.
---------- Post added at 04:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------
The Su35 is an updated Flanker as well. The upgrades themselves define the differences between the J11B and other Flankers. The J11B is pretty much a Chinese answer to the Su35, with similar upgrades to its fuselage, avionics, powerplant, and weaponry. Both planes feature phased array radar, radar absorbent material, composites, upgraded engines, and while not all of these are done to the same extent, the planes would be generally in the same league.
[QUOTE=escobar;190268]An engineering unit of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force has modified aircraft to make them adapted to the plateau environment in Tibet. The unit also wrote special plateau operations manuals to improve the aircraft maintenance work.
Beautifull pictures, thanks for posting, and as you noted as your density altitude goes up you have to either reduce takeoff weights and associated fitment or allow for longer take-off and landing rolls, and decreased climb performance.
nice pics(tibet)
![]()
I don't think so, if it really that bad, it will not enter service in significant number. Remember the CCTV news reporting the J -11B RCS , fuselage coated with RAM and significant weight reduction. Radar is capable of air to air and air to ground mode. Reported by a PLAAF pilot who flow it.
J-11B is definitely superior to old Su-27SK.
Lets recall old news
Finally... this is reported from CCTV. So this informations are approved by PLA armed forces. It can also mean semi- official data of J-11B.
Conclusion is the recent exercise of J-11B badly maul by other types of aircraft has nothing to do with J-11b ability, rather the incompetence PLAAF pilot who flew it.
Last edited by Lion; 05-25-2012 at 09:27 AM.
[QUOTE=escobar;190334]nice pics(tibet)
Absolutely beautifull, always nice to see these little sweethearts in their element, the Flanker is a gorgeous airplane and I'm sure these chicks are up to snuff, the comparison between Flankers and F-16s or J-10s is still an apples and oranges deal, and the reason the PLAAF has both in its inventory, and the reason that when the J-20 achieves IOC, it will be "added to the set", rather than supercede anything else immediately. To base an opinion on one set of circumstances isn't fair to either the aircraft or the pilots, they all have their strengths and weaknesses, if I were to be in a position to fly any thing in the PLAAF inventory, it would likely be J-11B. The reason many AF pilots choose to stay with the F-15 rather than move up to the F-22, when they had the opportunity.
Yes kinda of like the bad politics that killed the F-22 production in favor of an F-35 thats good enough, a little interservice rivalry can go a long way toward elimination of the best elements, that each service could bring to the fight. The Army, Marines, and to some extent, even the navy are more interested in a Strike Aircraft with some A2A, rather than an Air Superiority Fighter with some A2G. IMHO
Its one of the by products of having independant services all vying for a bigger piece of an ever shrinking pie, but in our case having civilian leadership in power over the services has worked out reasonably well all things considered.
Last edited by Air Force Brat; 05-25-2012 at 10:18 AM.
As far as I know the J11B incorporates a new radar, the original one being a PD radar, but it is rumored AESA is installed. Other upgrades include radar absorbent material near the intakes and composites that reduce its weight by over 700 kg. A new engine is installed as well as a missile warning approach and IRST. A new OBOG system is installed. The cockpit differs from the Su-30 and Su-27SMK due to its asymmetric nature and its large upgraded LCD screens. Dielectric panels are also installed on the stabilizers. Essentially the airframe design is the only link between the J11B and the Su27, with the internal systems completely different.
Among the Su-35 design features, worth of note is the absence of an overhead brake flap, a standard characteristic of the Su-27. Its functions are performed by an active rudder. The Su-35 chassis has been reinforced because of the increased takeoff and landing weight of the aircraft. For the same reason, the front bearing has two wheels. The improved radar stealth reduces the reflectance of the Su-35 in the X radio waveband and in the angle range of ±60°.
Irbis-E radar detects air targets with an absolute cross section of 3 m2 on a head-on course at a range of up to 400 km
Sukhoi Company (JSC) - Airplanes - Military Aircraft - Su-35
there are a few new features not present on Su-27s that have been added on Su-35, J-10B is a logic evolution, since Su-35 also has been improved
Last edited by MiG-29; 05-25-2012 at 06:31 PM.
J-11BS or Su-30???
![]()
It's likely to be a MKK. Perhaps a J-11BS but we haven't seen them in this kind of camo before.
---------- Post added at 10:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 AM ----------
The Su35 obviously makes changes to its original skin to meet its mission requirements. Their internal configuration and systems are completely new. What I was trying to say is that the J11B is like the Chinese equivalent of the Su35. Both are upgrades of the Su27 to meet requirements of the twenty first century.
Bookmarks